Orange County Commissioners Back Plan to Target Confederate Flags Without Actually Targeting Confederate Flags | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Orange County Commissioners Back Plan to Target Confederate Flags Without Actually Targeting Confederate Flags

Posted by on Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:17 PM

The Orange County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously last night to push forward with an amendment to its unified development ordinance that would limit the size of flags and flagpoles across the county, although the measure must still go before a public hearing before being enacted.


The move came after a “Southern heritage” organization known as Alamance County Takes Back Alamance County, or ACTBAC, which is registered as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, indirectly threatened to place enormous Confederate flags along various routes throughout the county in retaliation for recent attacks on their ideology, including a ban on Confederate flags in Orange County public schools and calls to take down Silent Sam, a controversial Confederate statue at UNC-Chapel Hill.


About a half dozen citizens backed the move. Among them, Maya Little, a doctoral candidate at UNC-Chapel Hill, argued that the Confederate flag promotes an ahistorical view of America’s past.


“This flag has nothing to do with Southern culture or heritage, and frankly, Southern culture deserves better than it,” Little insisted. “The flag, historically and today, serves to intimidate and threaten people of color and to promote an ahistorical understanding of the Civil War, of Jim Crow, of the last hundred and fifty years of our history.”

Commissioner Penny Rich offered support for those who spoke out. “When I think of the Confederate flag, I see it as a symbol of terrorism,” she explained. “We deserve more in Orange County.”


No one showed up to advocate against the amendment, although a few commissioners suggested that a public discussion that brought together people from both sides could be an important step before the final amendment is passed.

In order to maintain the right to free expression—and not to run afoul of the First Amendment—the UDO change must be content-neutral. That means the county can’t ban Confederate flags outright or prohibit their display on private property; the restrictions would apply to all flags.

The board commended residents for coming up with a rational and legal way to combat racism without infringing on the rights of those who wish to fly the Confederate flag on private property.


A public hearing, where the commissioners could potentially make a final decision, could be held as early as May 1.


Tags: , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

#1. it isn't reported in this article. Was Mr. de la Rosa a legal resident?
#2. I know attacking ICE …

by Timothy Oswald on A Raleigh Man Died of an Apparent Suicide While in Solitary Confinement at a For-Profit Immigration Prison in Georgia (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation