So What’s Going On With This Heated Durham NPO Debate? | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, March 15, 2018

So What’s Going On With This Heated Durham NPO Debate?

Posted by on Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM

This post is excerpted from the INDY’s morning newsletter, Primer. To read this morning’s edition in full, click here. To get all the day’s local and national headlines and insights delivered straight to your inbox, sign up here.

We’ve seen these kinds of debates throughout the Triangle in recent years, and they’re always fascinating to watch. They go something like this: people move into a somewhat affordable urban neighborhood, full of bungalows and midsize houses. But as the years go by, some of those houses are bought out by developers, demolished, and then rebuilt into something much bigger, maybe even duplexes or triplexes. The neighbors who have been there for a while complain that the developers and newcomers are destroying the character of their neighborhoods. The developers and newcomers say they’re just taking advantage of their private property rights. Which brings us to the current neighborhood protection overlay debate raging in Durham.
  • Some background: The neighborhood in question in Old West Durham, where a decade ago houses were selling for less than $100,000. Now, prices are up in the mid-250s. A group of neighbors petitioned the city for an NPO that would require a backyard tree and regulate house sizes. They want "to ensure that new residential development is compatible with the established urban form, modest scale, and mill village character of the neighborhood. Preservation of green space and tree canopy are primary motivations for the formulation of a number of these standards.”
  • Other neighbors oppose the NPO, considering it overreach. As property owner John Temple told the Herald-Sun: ”This argument that it’s developers against the neighborhood does not hold water to me. I love my neighbors, I just disagree with them right now. [The NPO] takes away private property rights.”
  • On Tuesday night, the city’s planning commission—with a few absences and abstentions—voted 5–4 against the NPO. Per the DHS: “Commissioner George Brine said the contentious process may have relied a little too much on the Old West Durham listserv, leaving out people who don't spend much time online. He disagrees with some NPO stipulations like height without considering relation to setbacks, and the backyard tree mandate.”
  • But the planning commission isn’t the final say. The issue will come before the city council in May.

WHAT IT MEANS: I’m certainly sympathetic to neighbors who moved in and saw their neighborhood change, but to me, the issue isn’t simply what kind of neighborhood Old West Durham should be, but rather what the broader character of the city will be. By limiting housing options such as duplexes and triplexes and reducing the amount of infill in urban neighborhoods, the NPO could drive up housing prices. As the DHS explains: “In February, Mayor Steve Schewel emailed Old West Durham leader John Schelp to express concern the NPO would hurt affordability in the long run by making duplexes, triplexes and quads impossible to build.” On the other hand, knocking down smaller houses and building gargantuan replacements isn’t exactly a formula for affordability, either.

Tags: , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Police murdered MR. CLARK and got away with it. IT WON'T STOP UNTIL ALL DIRTY COPS ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by William Parker on Durham Police Fatally Shoot Man At New Hope Commons Shopping Center (News)

In the Montessori School of Raleigh Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the 18 CVS 000702 case in Superior Court …

by Sam Harrison on Breaking: Nancy Errichetti, Head of the Montessori School of Raleigh, Arrested for Allegedly Aiding and Abetting Sexual Abuse (News)

Most Read

Most Recent Comments

Police murdered MR. CLARK and got away with it. IT WON'T STOP UNTIL ALL DIRTY COPS ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by William Parker on Durham Police Fatally Shoot Man At New Hope Commons Shopping Center (News)

In the Montessori School of Raleigh Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the 18 CVS 000702 case in Superior Court …

by Sam Harrison on Breaking: Nancy Errichetti, Head of the Montessori School of Raleigh, Arrested for Allegedly Aiding and Abetting Sexual Abuse (News)

Ingrid - the facts are coming out, you're right. But they don't support your assertions, sorry to say. Too many …

by ToWhomItMayConcern on Montessori School of Raleigh Directress Says She Was Fired for Talking to the Cops About Sexual Abuse at the School (News)

I just read this salacious thread for the first time and unfortunately found it to be overflowing with misleading information …

by Ingrid Flutter on Montessori School of Raleigh Directress Says She Was Fired for Talking to the Cops About Sexual Abuse at the School (News)

Trigger-happy Durham cops strike again.

by ruby on Durham Police Fatally Shoot Man At New Hope Commons Shopping Center (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation