The NCGOP Is Desperate to Put the Stink of Scandal on Roy Cooper | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, February 15, 2018

The NCGOP Is Desperate to Put the Stink of Scandal on Roy Cooper

Posted by on Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:27 AM

This post is excerpted from the INDY’s morning newsletter, Primer. To read this morning’s edition in full, click here. To get all the day’s local and national headlines and insights delivered straight to your inbox, sign up here.

For the state Republican Party, the troubling thing about Roy Cooper is that, well, he’s popular. In the most recent poll, he’s at 46 percent approval, with only 26 percent disapproving [ABC 11]. His exceedingly safe, uber-centrist form of Democratic politics doesn’t polarize people the way that, say, the General Assembly’s merry band of ideologues does. So, with elections forthcoming and the GOP’s supermajorities in question, Republican leaders want to take Cooper down a peg. And that’s what yesterday was all about: ginning up a scandal to knock that halo off Cooper’s head.
  • Here’s what happened: On Wednesday, the leader of the right-wing Civitas Institute filed a complaint with the state’s ethics commission over whether Cooper had accepted an illegal gift by accepting $58 million from the developers of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline for a mitigation fund [N&O]. Coincidentally, GOP House and Senate leaders then immediately demanded that Cooper recuse himself from weighing in on the class-size bill they just passed—which also diverts the money from that fund to schools along the ACP’s path and reestablishes a bipartisan elections board—because there's been an ethics complaint [N&O]. That, friends, is what we call a coordinated attack.
  • Cooper gave in, announcing that he’ll let the bill become law without his signature but also defending the mitigation fund and castigating the legislature for inserting poison pills into vital legislation.
  • “Cooper said he would allow the bill to become law without his signature because of the need to provide the class-size fix and to expand funding for pre-K. He called the rest of the bill ‘political attacks and power grabs.’ ‘The good parts of this bill are not a celebration,’ Cooper said at a press conference at the Executive Mansion. ‘They are just a sigh of relief. A sigh of relief that came too late, but we’re glad it’s here. Clearly, clearly the legislature has heard our voices.’”
  • N&O: “‘The legislators manufactured a power struggle about a pipeline that they said they wanted,’ Cooper said at a press conference at the executive mansion. ‘They raided the money that was supposed to improve the economy and bring jobs and lessen the environmental impact for the very communities that are affected.’ Cooper said that the pipeline fund would have strong conflict of interest provisions. He said qualified independent experts will determine how the money is spent for environmental mitigation and economic development. … Republican state Senate leader Phil Berger said Cooper’s decision to let the bill go into law without his signature confirmed that the governor has a clear conflict of interest. ‘It’s clear he got his hand caught in the cookie jar and he’s doing everything he can to twist and turn and come up with an explanation that he hopes will stick,’ Berger said told reporters after Cooper’s press conference.”

WHAT IT MEANS: Cooper’s right that this is a manufactured power struggle, as the legislature has manufactured so many power struggles since Cooper’s election. I’ve said before that Cooper’s team has botched this thing, like they weren’t prepared for the GOP to play dirty. It strains credulity that, as Cooper says, this payment was completely disconnected from the permitting process; but also, setting up this type of mitigation fund and forcing concessions from multibillion-dollar corporations who want to run an potentially environmentally damaging pipeline through eastern North Carolina is just smart policy. There’s zero evidence I’ve seen that Cooper actually intended it as a slush fund to help his political cronies, as the GOP alleges. Cooper’s mistake, I think, is that he’s not tying that payment to the permit. It’s totally reasonable to demand that large corporations pay for potential externalities for something that will make them a ton of money. Personally, I would have preferred that the state deny the permit and shut this project down. But if it has to go through, it’s best to take precautions. And now, the state will have none.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation