The NCGA’s Next Big Idea: Break Up the Wake County School System | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

The NCGA’s Next Big Idea: Break Up the Wake County School System

Posted by on Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:56 AM

This post is excerpted from the INDY’s morning newsletter, Primer. To read this morning’s edition in full, click here. To get all the day’s local and national headlines and insights delivered straight to your inbox, sign up here.

If you were wondering what the next the legislature would do to mess with urban areas, wonder no more: next week, lawmakers will begin studying how to break up large school systems, like in Wake and Mecklenburg, which, as far as I know, no urban government has asked for.
  • From the N&O: “A newly formed joint legislative study committee is charged with reporting back by May 1 on whether to recommend passing legislation to let previously merged school districts be divided. The committee, whose first meeting is Feb. 21, would also look at the best ways to break up school districts, including whether to require a referendum by voters.”
  • “The bill’s primary sponsors are Reps. Bill Brawley and John Bradford of Mecklenburg County and Rep. Chris Malone of Wake County. … Brawley, Bradford and Malone also represent counties where there’s been support from some suburban residents to break up their school districts. Many transplants to North Carolina are used to individual towns running their own small school systems. In contrast, most school systems in North Carolina are county-based. Over the years, many school systems in the state merged to try to save money and to integrate schools. The state went from 167 school districts in the 1960s to 115 now. Wake County is the nation’s 15th largest school system and the state’s biggest school system with 160,429 students.”
  • In a tweetstorm, Wake County Commissioner John Burns laid out why he thinks this is a terrible idea:
screen_shot_2018-02-14_at_8.01.10_am.png

screen_shot_2018-02-14_at_8.00.46_am.png
screen_shot_2018-02-14_at_8.01.01_am.png


WHAT IT MEANS: At first blush, I tend to think Burns’s critique is right. Multiple new bureaucracies all scrambling for funds would be a mess. Schools in Cary and Fuquay-Varina could end up vying for resources against southeast Raleigh and Rolesville, each with budget requests the county commission would have to consider one by one, as local school boards in North Carolina have no taxing power. More than that, the possibility of a de facto resegregation would be all too real—white suburban parents forming their own district to keep their kids away from (wink, nod) “urban” schools. These parents would then have the money and influence to insist that the county send more cash their way, not to struggling schools that need it.

Related: Wake is considering ditching its annual budget fight with the school board and going to a multiyear funding plan instead, which strikes me as a much better idea. [N&O]

Tags: , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation