What Nonpartisan Legislative Districts Look Like: First Thoughts on Special Master Nathaniel Persily’s Game-Changing New Maps | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

What Nonpartisan Legislative Districts Look Like: First Thoughts on Special Master Nathaniel Persily’s Game-Changing New Maps

Posted by on Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:58 AM

click to enlarge screen_shot_2017-11-13_at_6.16.png
Special master Nathaniel Persily, who was appointed November 1 by a federal court to analyze and redraw North Carolina’s hyper-gerrymandered legislative districts, has released a draft plan ahead of his December 1 deadline and asked for feedback from the anti-gerrymandering plaintiffs and lawmakers.
  • Persily: “Underlying the Court’s prohibition on examining election returns or prioritizing incumbency is reliance on a bedrock principle that the Special Master’s Plan shall be construed in a nonpartisan fashion. That is not to say that the plan will not have partisan, incumbency-related, or other electoral effects—all redistricting plans do. Rather, the principles that guide the production of the plan must be nonpartisan in nature and the changes to the districts must be explainable on that basis.”
  • The N&O: “Persily redrew state Senate district lines in Hoke and Cumberland counties that avoids what he called a ‘jutting arm into Fayetteville’ supported by the Republican-led General Assembly and takes in the whole town of Spring Lake to the north. He redrew three Senate districts in Guilford County and House districts there as well. His map changes House districts in Bladen, Sampson and Wayne counties, as well as in Mecklenburg and Wake counties.”
  • N.C. Policy Watch: “At first glance, Persily’s maps are obviously different than GOP lawmakers’ initial redraw with more compact districts and less squiggly lines. He explains the changes in each district in the Monday order. … He moved House district 57, Guilford County, north and west to create a compact district in north Greensboro, the order states. Previously, the district retained ‘a backwards L shape’ along the eastern side of Greensboro, according to the Court, it perpetuates the racial predominance of its predecessor district by over-concentrating the African American population in the area.”
  • Persily released his plans early to “give the parties time to lodge objections and to make suggestions, as to unpairing incumbents or otherwise, that might be accommodated in the final plan to be delivered to the Court by December 1.” Several lawmakers look to be double-bunked under the new districts—meaning two incumbents will have to run against each other. “Persily did not take account incumbency in the ‘draft plan’ he released because the plaintiffs and legislative defendants only just released their incumbent lists last week.”

WHAT IT MEANS: More analysis is needed, but the most likely result of these districts would be more competitive races. And that would be a great thing for North Carolina democracy.

screen_shot_2017-11-14_at_8.30.19_am.png
screen_shot_2017-11-14_at_8.31.13_am.png

Tags: , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Fine work, Mr. Billman. Your readers are probably aware that most of the NC conservative shenanigans can be laid at …

by growlybear on The Republican Power Plays at the Heart of N.C. Politics (News)

I have very little patience for the empty-headed Pro-poison crowd, which is begging the government to take everyones rights away …

by DoritoReiss on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

Most Recent Comments

Fine work, Mr. Billman. Your readers are probably aware that most of the NC conservative shenanigans can be laid at …

by growlybear on The Republican Power Plays at the Heart of N.C. Politics (News)

I have very little patience for the empty-headed Pro-poison crowd, which is begging the government to take everyones rights away …

by DoritoReiss on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

About time some one fixed this.

by Bob Schroeck on Durham Attorney Scott Holmes Challenges N.C. Court Fees as Unconstitutional (News)

And I'm just getting started- What do you think of a society that ritualizes placing its babies -their most vulnerable, …

by Nellie McFarlane De Jong on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

Feel free to put your faith in pharmaceutical products if you want to live like that. I prefer not to, …

by Nellie McFarlane De Jong on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation