The Alamance County Sheriff's Office Was Booted from a Federal Immigration Program Over Accusations of Discrimination. Now It Wants to Rejoin. | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, November 9, 2017

The Alamance County Sheriff's Office Was Booted from a Federal Immigration Program Over Accusations of Discrimination. Now It Wants to Rejoin.

Posted by on Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:56 PM

The Alamance County Sheriff's Office is seeking to rejoin a federal program that allows local law enforcement to carry out immigration enforcement duties—five years after it was removed from the program over accusations of discrimination.

The agency's involvement in the 287(g) program was terminated in 2012 as the U.S. Department of Justice investigated racial profiling at the Sheriff's Office. The DOJ filed a civil rights lawsuit saying the ACSO "routinely discriminates against and targets Latinos."

In 2015, a judge ruled in favor of Sheriff Terry Johnson. The DOJ appealed, and last year the agencies reached a settlement that called for the implementation of bias-free policing, citizen-complaint and data-collection policies. 
click to enlarge Alamance County Sheriff Terry Johnson
  • Alamance County Sheriff Terry Johnson

According to the Times-News of Burlington, Immigration and Customs Enforcement asked Johnson in the spring to rejoin 287(g). Johnson "immediately agreed."

Now, the ACLU of North Carolina is urging the Department of Homeland Security to deny the agency's application.

“Alamance County lost its 287(g) status for a reason. From ordering his deputies to ‘bring me some Mexicans’ to overseeing egregious patterns of racial profiling, Sheriff Johnson has a well-documented history of targeting the Latino community in Alamance County,” said ACLU of North Carolina Staff Attorney Irena Como. “No agency with such a terrible record of civil rights abuses should receive federal funds to further target residents for arrests, detention, and possibly deportation.”

The state ACLU sent a letter to Homeland Security on Tuesday outlining the findings of the DOJ investigation, "Alamance's discriminatory use of 287(g)," and Fourth Amendment violations committed by the agency through "impermissible checkpoints."

Over the summer, groups including the Alamance County Human Relations Commission, El Centro Hispano Inc., the NC NAACP, and Southeast Immigrant Rights Network signed on to an open letter asking Johnson not to rejoin the program, citing the "national spotlight" that came with the DOJ investigation.

Among the DOJ's findings: deputies were more likely to pull over Latino drivers, they regularly set up checkpoints near Latino neighborhoods, and they handed down harsher punishments to Latino motorists. The findings came shortly after an INDY analysis of Alamance County traffic stop data. Federal filings alleged instances of apparent racism and abuse of the 287(g) program, although the Sheriff's Office denied it engaged in discrimination and suggested the accusations were politically motivated.

According to the ACLU, the Trump administration (which previously called for an expansion of the 287(g) program) will soon begin considering applications from law enforcement agencies. If the ACSO is approved, it will join five North Carolina sheriff's departments in the program: Cabarrus, Gaston, Henderson, Mecklenburg, and Wake.

Johnson couldn't immediately be reached for comment, but he told the Times-News that, if accepted to the program, Alamance deputies will only assist ICE in the county detention center or if asked to participate in an ICE operation.

“We have never asked anybody, unless we’ve had to arrest them for something or they committed a crime, what their status is there,” Johnson told the paper. “I don’t really care. But if they commit a crime, we’re coming after them whether they’re American, Latino, Guatemalan, I don’t care. We’re going to work the case.”

ICE said it could not comment on pending 287(g) decisions.

Tags: , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Fine work, Mr. Billman. Your readers are probably aware that most of the NC conservative shenanigans can be laid at …

by growlybear on The Republican Power Plays at the Heart of N.C. Politics (News)

I have very little patience for the empty-headed Pro-poison crowd, which is begging the government to take everyones rights away …

by DoritoReiss on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

Most Recent Comments

Fine work, Mr. Billman. Your readers are probably aware that most of the NC conservative shenanigans can be laid at …

by growlybear on The Republican Power Plays at the Heart of N.C. Politics (News)

I have very little patience for the empty-headed Pro-poison crowd, which is begging the government to take everyones rights away …

by DoritoReiss on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

About time some one fixed this.

by Bob Schroeck on Durham Attorney Scott Holmes Challenges N.C. Court Fees as Unconstitutional (News)

And I'm just getting started- What do you think of a society that ritualizes placing its babies -their most vulnerable, …

by Nellie McFarlane De Jong on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

Feel free to put your faith in pharmaceutical products if you want to live like that. I prefer not to, …

by Nellie McFarlane De Jong on The Problem with N.C.’s Religious Exemption Law (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation