Over Accusations of Gerrymandering, Republicans Introduce Bill to Redraw Judicial Maps | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Over Accusations of Gerrymandering, Republicans Introduce Bill to Redraw Judicial Maps

Posted by on Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:05 AM

A controversial and last-ditch effort to overhaul the state’s judicial maps before the legislative session ends generated fierce debate at a committee hearing Monday, but passed and is headed to the House floor for debate.

The Republican proposal, sponsored by Representative Justin Burr of Stanly, would fundamentally alter the state’s existing judicial districts by redrawing prosecutorial districts as well as district and superior court lines—an effort critics say is a transparent attempt to stack the bench with Republican judges and an attack on the judicial branch. They also expressed concern that the bill was drafted without consulting key stakeholders for input, including judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys.

“I believe it’s partisan gerrymandering, and it’s based on the majority party trying to get an edge in terms of the judges in the state of North Carolina. I do not feel like we should be interfering with the judicial system this way,” Representative Jean Farmer-Butterfield, D-Wilson, told the INDY. “This weekend, my phone was off the hook. Judges are very upset about this. People in the community are concerned and they feel like they haven’t had the chance to have any input. They feel like the process should be slowed down, looked at, and get all the stakeholders’ input before something this important is changed.”

Farmer-Butterfield says her constituents are concerned about an overhaul to the districts in place. Pitt County recently elected its first female African-American judge in the county’s history, she said. “I’ve heard from [constituents] and they’re very upset. They don’t want this change.”

Duane Hall, a Wake County Democrat, predicted that the new lines would result in 14 districts that would likely elect Democrats compared to 41 Republicans at the district court level, and a 12–45 GOP advantage at the superior court level.

“This is a major, major piece of legislation,” Hall said. “I’ve gotten over two hundred and fifty calls today about this. I take this extremely seriously. This is racial gerrymandering.”

Other Democratic representatives were quick to point to the measure’s potentially racial and partisan impacts. House Democratic leader Darren Jackson, D-Wake, noted that one of the map’s judicial districts, 22B, appeared very similar to a legislative district recently struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court as a racial gerrymander. Democrat Graig Meyer of Orange County wondered if the judicial maps meet the standards of the Voting Rights Act. (Burr said he thought so.)

“There’s clearly some reason these lines are as squiggly as they are,” Representative Grier Martin, D-Wake, added. “You claim that it was not based on racial data. What then, was the main factor? Partisan advantage? Or some other factor?”

“A number of other factors,” Burr responded. He later repeated one of his most common answers: "This is a multipronged process."

Burr also bristled in response to accusations of gerrymandering, arguing that the maps were drawn decades ago under Democratic rule and subsequently tweaked whenever a Republican judge was elected. As an example, he pointed to Mecklenburg County, where, thanks to district lines, around half of the population could elect two of the county's seven judges. His bill, he said, was righting years of inequity and “correcting gerrymandering. We are fixing problems of the past!”

But the bill’s opponents—including the watchdog judicial group N.C. Voters for Clean Elections, the League of Women Voters, a superior court judge and a district attorney—didn’t buy it.

“Maybe the U.S. Supreme Court wasn’t clear when the nation’s highest court told you to redraw our state’s gerrymandered maps. You told the public you were too busy with the budget to redraw unconstitutional legislative districts. Instead, you are embarking on the biggest challenge of our judiciary in over fifty years—done in secret, behind closed doors, and without public input,” said Melissa Price Kromm of North Carolina Voters for Clean Elections during the bill’s public comments. “You’re crippling the courts, punishing the people of North Carolina, just to grease the wheels of partisan politics. This needs to have full and public input.”

The bill passed out of committee 7–5 along party lines.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

I should also add that it was professor Daniel Sherman who penned the letter that we all signed after some …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

The anthropology department had posted a similarly strong letter previous to ours. The progressive faculty network also signed a similar …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

Most Recent Comments

I should also add that it was professor Daniel Sherman who penned the letter that we all signed after some …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

The anthropology department had posted a similarly strong letter previous to ours. The progressive faculty network also signed a similar …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

Hello my brothers and sisters,do you want to become a member of the great Illuminati brotherhood,so you can be rich

by Helen Paul on Local Businesses Band Together to Support Houstonians Reeling from Harvey (News)

I take anything I read in the INDY with a grain of salt, especially regarding alleged views on the police …

by MJKopechne on Durham Candidates Talk Gentrification, Policing, and Civil Rights at People's Forum (News)

Great idea! Especially involving young people. What has been done since? …

by Martha C. Brock on Parks Guru: Ideas for Dix Should Arise on Site, Not Be Manufactured in Traditional Political Settings (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation