The N.C. Senate Overrides Cooper's HB 467 Veto, Hog-Farm-Protection Bill is Law | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, May 11, 2017

The N.C. Senate Overrides Cooper's HB 467 Veto, Hog-Farm-Protection Bill is Law

Posted by on Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:38 PM

In a blow to environmentalists and critics of the commercial hog farming industry, the N.C. Senate voted 30–18 this afternoon to override Governor Cooper's veto of House Bill 467. The controversial bill would limit liability in nuisance cases for agricultural and forestry operations, including hog farms.

Yesterday, the House voted 74–40, largely along party lines, in favor of the override (spoiler alert: Republicans voted for it).

As the INDY has previously reported, HB 467 restricts the amount of money property owners can collect in nuisance lawsuits filed against agricultural operations. Now that it is law, it will essentially cap the damages property owners can collect in nuisance lawsuits at the fair market value of their property, which critics point out is often made lower by the presence of those commercial farms.

Cooper vetoed the bill last week, shortly after lawyers representing hundreds of plaintiffs involved in twenty-six federal lawsuits against Murphy-Brown LLC, the hog division of Smithfield Foods, submitted new evidence showing that fecal matter from the hog operations has wound up outside of homes and has likely ended up in their homes and even on their food.

Senator Brent Jackson, R-Sampson, the sponsor of the Senate companion bill, who has received more than $130,000 in campaign contributions from the commercial hog farming industry, reacted to the news with a glowing statement: "I am incredibly pleased to that this bill providing legal certainty to family farmers and the thousands of North Carolinians who earn their living in the agricultural industry is now law," he wrote. "This is a victory for farmworkers and our rural communities."

The NC Pork Council, which has contributed heavily to state Republicans, struck a similarly celebratory tone.

"Farmers across our state are grateful that the Senate has acted to override the Gov. Cooper veto to provide them more certainty and protection from predatory lawyers. The votes this week in the House and Senate, by members of both political parties, sent a clear message that lawmakers support agriculture and its unique role in providing food to families."

In addition to the Pork Council, the supporters of HB 467, including House sponsor Representative Jimmy Dixon (who has received more than $115,000 in campaign contributions from Big Pork), have consistently argued that the legislation is intended to protect rural family farmers from greedy "out of state" attorneys. However, the twenty-six federal lawsuits at the heart of much of the debate were filed by a North Carolina-based law firm against a $14 billion Chinese-owned multinational corporation on behalf of mostly low-income African-American plaintiffs.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Most Recent Comments

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

#1. it isn't reported in this article. Was Mr. de la Rosa a legal resident?
#2. I know attacking ICE …

by Timothy Oswald on A Raleigh Man Died of an Apparent Suicide While in Solitary Confinement at a For-Profit Immigration Prison in Georgia (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation