Is the Raleigh City Council About to Spike the Long-Planned Falls Whitewater Park? | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Is the Raleigh City Council About to Spike the Long-Planned Falls Whitewater Park?

Posted by on Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:08 AM

click to enlarge PHOTO BY BEN MCKEOWN
  • Photo by Ben McKeown
In a measure included as part of the Raleigh City Council’s consent agenda this evening, the long-planned Falls Whitewater Park would lose the $150,000 earmarked for the project in 2005 as part of a plan that allocates funds from the city and county’s occupancy and food and beverage taxes. And while one city official seems unapologetic about the potential cut, advocates of the park plan say they were caught off guard by the news.

When asked if the cut was anticipated, city chief of staff Lou Buonpane told the INDY Friday, “Well, I guess that depends on by who.” He added that the recommendation to terminate the funding was a result of the park’s failure to meet “terms” spelled out in the 2005 agreement—inadequate food and beverage revenues, a lack of required matching funds, and/or “if the receiving entities do not meet the elements of the agreement.”

“If you had eleven years and didn’t do what you said you were going to do, should you still be in the revenue stream?” he asks.

Elizabeth Gardner, president of the Falls Whitewater Park Committee and a WRAL meteorologist, says that over the project’s decade-plus life, this is not the first time the $150,000 has been threatened. But she says she found the timing of the move—and the fact that nobody has informed her committee about it (she was informed about the consent-agenda item by the INDY)—“kind of strange,” given the fact that city council member Bonner Gaylord told her he was planning on suggesting to the rest of the board that the city fund the project to the tune of $1.5 million at tonight’s meeting.

The park—a dream to bring a whitewater destination to the Neuse River below the Falls Lake dam—has been a work in progress for more than a decade. To date, the city has invested $300,000 in it, including $100,000 in funds approved in January to pay for permitting.

In 2010, a preliminary conceptual plan estimated the cost of the project at just under $3 million, but the price tag didn’t seem to deter the council, which approved a formal plan for the park that was developed the following year.

Gardner says she disagrees with Buonpane’s statement regarding the time it has taken to see the project come to fruition. Between the economic downturn, when “nobody was spending money on anything,” to a split vote in 2014 that, had it passed, would have “put the whole thing on a parks bond,” the lack of significant progress has not been self-inflicted, she argues.

“In a perfect world, they would put the whole thing on the parks bond and be done with it,” Gardner says. “We really just want the city to fund it, but because it’s not a ball field—it’s non-traditional—they have not been willing to pull the trigger. With everything that’s happened, normal people probably would have given up, but we really think this is going to be a wonderful amenity.”

Should Gaylord convince the council to spend $1.5 million on the project, advocates hope the county would throw in $1 million. Committee members would then raise the difference, about $1 million.

“We believe in this that much,” Gardner says.

Whether council members—and their counterparts on the county commission—do, too, remains to be seen.

Tags: , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Mr. Goldsmith, please read Jennifer's post below. If you have journalistic integrity, please fix your blog as it shows up …

by Sherry D. on Mayor McFarlane Will Not Be Turned Away from Democratic Party Events, Spokesman Says (News)

Look Lisa, your grandfather's story is tough. I would suggest however that he is a victim of capitalist oppression, not …

by CPF (CommiePinkoFag) on “Durham’s a Bright Light for Our Movement”: After Their Cases Were Continued Until November, Defend Durham Activists Took a Victory Lap (News)

Most Recent Comments

Mr. Goldsmith, please read Jennifer's post below. If you have journalistic integrity, please fix your blog as it shows up …

by Sherry D. on Mayor McFarlane Will Not Be Turned Away from Democratic Party Events, Spokesman Says (News)

Look Lisa, your grandfather's story is tough. I would suggest however that he is a victim of capitalist oppression, not …

by CPF (CommiePinkoFag) on “Durham’s a Bright Light for Our Movement”: After Their Cases Were Continued Until November, Defend Durham Activists Took a Victory Lap (News)

Apparently we must hope that the N&O doesn't follow through on this trend by deciding that they will cover legislative …

by khoragos on The N&O’s Performing Arts Correspondent Says the Paper Is Cutting Back on Performing Arts Reviews (News)

Cancelling the parade affects all people. I usually went just for the parade, not the night events. Parents take their …

by Aiden on Carolina Jews for Justice Says NC Pride Schedule Fix Isn't Enough (News)

I should also add that it was professor Daniel Sherman who penned the letter that we all signed after some …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation