U.S. District Court Judge Upholds NC Voter ID Law | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Monday, April 25, 2016

U.S. District Court Judge Upholds NC Voter ID Law

Posted by on Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 PM

In an opinion issued on Monday night, U.S. District Judge Thomas Schroeder ruled in favor of North Carolina in a lawsuit brought by the North Carolina NAACP and several churches and plaintiffs, including ninety-two year old Rosanell Eaton

Schroeder, a George W. Bush appointee, dismissed all claims against North Carolina in a 485-page ruling, including parts of the law that cut the number of early voting days and eliminated same-day registration and voting, and said that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the law violated the Voting Rights Act or the Constitution. The provisions regarding same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting will take effect after the June congressional primaries.
 
click to enlarge PHOTO BY KCIVEY/FLICKR/CREATIVE COMMONS.
  • Photo by KCIvey/Flickr/Creative Commons.

"Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that the reasonable impediment voting process is more difficult," Schroeder wrote, "than other voting mechanisms that Plaintiffs either advocate for or have not challenged." Democracy NC's Bob Hall also points out one section where Schroeder says that, within the scope of the past twenty-five years, "there is little official [racial] discrimination to consider" in North Carolina. 

Governor Pat McCrory praised the decision, saying in a statement, "This ruling further affirms that requiring a photo ID in order to vote is not only common-sense, it’s constitutional.” 

The ACLU's Voting Rights Project director Dale Ho said in a statement condemning the decision that the group is "already examining an appeal," while the NC NAACP has a conference call scheduled for Tuesday to discuss its next move. An appeal would go to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond. 

"The sweeping barriers imposed by this law undermine voter participation and have an overwhelmingly discriminatory impact on African-Americans," Ho said. "This ruling does not change that reality."

Schroeder, coincidentally, is the judge assigned to the ACLU and Equality NC's HB 2 case.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Most Recent Comments

@jerryg so if the mayor has no power why should we vote then?

by snake00 on Runoff for Raleigh Mayor's Post May Be Ahead as Francis Denies McFarlane a Majority of Votes (News)

Cora landed the endorsements of the Durham Committee (DC) and the Friends (FD) for 10,400 votes.
Huggins with the DC …

by Frank Hyman on Cole-McFadden Survives Durham Council Primary, Moffitt Does Not (News)

Cora landed the endorsements of the Durham Committee (DC) and the Friends (FD) for 10,400 votes.
Huggins with the DC …

by Frank Hyman on Durham's Next Mayor Will Be Steve Schewel or Farad Ali (News)

Just because one of our two newly elected Council members is pro-neighborhood and natural resources, it does not qualify her …

by Meredith de la Vergne on Make Way for the NIMBY Raleigh City Council, as Newcomers Nicole Stewart and Stef Mendell Oust Bonner Gaylord and Defeat Stacy Miller (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation