Cary Town Council Votes to Amend Its Comprehensive Plan | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Cary Town Council Votes to Amend Its Comprehensive Plan

Posted by on Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:33 PM

Arlington Park - PHOTO BY JEREMY LANGE
  • Photo by Jeremy Lange
  • Arlington Park

The Cary Town Council voted 6-1 this evening to amend a portion of its official land-use map from residential to commercial, likely to allow for a Publix grocery store to be built directly adjacent to the Arlington Park subdivision in the northwestern part of the town. 

Neighbors have opposed the comprehensive plan amendment, but Council members assured them this evening that the applicant will be made to do a good job with shopping center, via gradual transition and a buffer, a shopping center that provides walk-ability and pedestrian amenities rather than "a big-box sea of asphalt shopping center," as one Council member put it. 

City planners painted the area as being undeserved by commercial development and emphasized that the town's comprehensive plan is not a promise that needs to be held fast to, but rather a vision that could and will change at will.

"The "A" stands for amendment," said Mark Evangelista, the chair of Cary's Planning and Zoning Board. The board had voted in favor of the amendment 7-1 back in January. "Even the Constitution can be amended. That's what this process is for."

Council member Don Frantz said he believes that medium-density residential and/or commercial is a better option for the property in question than medium-density and/or high-density residential. 

"I think this can be done in a way that respects and protects area residents, especially those adjacent to this site," he said. "I hope the applicant hears the concerns of the resident first and foremost, and those of the Council as well."

For its part, Publix, or rather the Florida property company that's pushing for it,  has already announced that it is definitely bringing a store to Amberly Village, paying no mind that rezoning the property still has to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Board and by the Town Council.

Council member Jack Smith said it was unfortunate that "outside interests got involved" with the proposal and "poisoned the well." 

"It created an aura of distrust with the neighborhood that hadn't even reached out or worked with us yet and they're already hearing from outside agencies and entities and planting a lack of trust, like there's a secret plan," he said. "It's unfair those neighbors who had to listen to that BS, violating this and violating that like it's a treaty."

"I feel bad that we have a lot of good Cary citizens out there who have written to us and kind of think we are breaking a promise," Council member Ken George said. "The truth is the land-use plan has never been a promise. It is a vision, not a promise. It's not something that's static, not something that's set in stone. It's something that has to adapt to changes." 

Jennifer Robinson, whose district covers the Amberly Village proposal area, was the lone dissenting vote.

"I empathize with the people who moved in here and looked at the land-use plan and made a decision to buy based on [that]," she says. "I know community feel is a huge deal to someone when they go and invest in a home believing that they are going to get one thing and then it gets changed. That's very hard for them to go with that change."

Though she couldn't be convinced that amending the town's comprehensive plan was a good idea, she could be, and was, outnumbered; the rest of the Council members had already done a good enough job of convincing themselves. 

Tags: , , ,

Pin It

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Wow. So the News and Observer is resigning from supporting local arts. So much for the grant proposals that will …

by John R. Harris, PhD on The N&O’s Performing Arts Correspondent Says the Paper Is Cutting Back on Performing Arts Reviews (News)

According to every report, he mishandled provisional ballots during the 2016 primary in NC, but he had no nefarious reasons …

by marksa23 on Durham Elections Worker Indicted for Mishandling March 2016 Primary Ballots (News)

Most Recent Comments

Wow. So the News and Observer is resigning from supporting local arts. So much for the grant proposals that will …

by John R. Harris, PhD on The N&O’s Performing Arts Correspondent Says the Paper Is Cutting Back on Performing Arts Reviews (News)

According to every report, he mishandled provisional ballots during the 2016 primary in NC, but he had no nefarious reasons …

by marksa23 on Durham Elections Worker Indicted for Mishandling March 2016 Primary Ballots (News)

To this day, that the South dare stand between
the YSA and their dreams of world conquest,
yet sticks …

by Jaddy Baddy on Duke University Removes Robert E. Lee Statue (News)

We held a Town Hall for Mr. Holding, told him over a month in advance and it was while he …

by Andrea Biondi on Constituents to Congressman George Holding: You Suck (News)

@SLAKFAC there is nothing fringe about the death of Heather Heyer. She's not fringily dead. She's smack dab in the …

by George Greene on Durham City Council Member: White Supremacists Rallying in Durham at Noon (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation