Thom Tillis votes against a resolution condemning Donald Trump’s no-Muslims plan, blames procedure | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Friday, December 11, 2015

Thom Tillis votes against a resolution condemning Donald Trump’s no-Muslims plan, blames procedure

Posted by on Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:17 AM

imgres.jpg
Still think Donald Trump speaks only for the furthest fringes of the Republican Party? One of North Carolina’s U.S. senators just proved you wrong.

As you’ve probably heard, Trump, currently pulling more than double the support of his nearest rival, Ted Cruz, recently proposed a “temporary” (read: probably not temporary) ban on Muslims entering the United States. In his own words:

Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.

Of course, Trump’s idea is utterly idiotic and racist, not to mention infeasible—e.g., what does “figure out what is going on” mean?—but no matter: Since he unveiled this latest “policy proposal,” he’s actually gained ground in the polling, despite top establishment conservatives and other GOP candidates either denouncing his statements or refusing to actually answer the question.

Trump’s ideas do have some support, though. And so on Thursday, U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, saw an opportunity to put his Republican colleagues on the spot. Leahy introduced a resolution attached to a nuclear terrorism bill that would effectively denounce Trump’s plan. The resolution simply states: “The sense of the Senate that the United States must not bar individuals from entering into the United States based on their religion, as such action would be contrary to the fundamental principles on which this nation was founded.”

Surprisingly, it worked; the bill passed the 20-member Senate Judiciary committee with 16 votes, including seven Republicans.

Four adherents to the Party of Lincoln, however, just couldn’t get behind the kind of radical liberal-ism that says you can’t make someone pass some hackneyed religious test in order to enter a coun-try founded on freedom of religion. Who were these four brave souls? Per The Atlantic:

Yet Cruz and three other Republicans on the committee—Senators Jeff Sessions of Alabama, David Vitter of Louisiana, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina—all voted against it. 

That’s right: Not only was Trump’s foe for the Republican nomination unable to pass this simplest of Constitutional tests, but so were three other senators, including North Carolina’s own Thom Tillis. The same guy who wants to protect restaurants from the scourge of Big Handwashing is hesitant to support a resolution—not a bill—that says the United States shouldn’t (not can’t) ban Muslims from entering the country.

When asked why he voted against the resolution, Tillis told McClatchy that he “didn’t like the way the measure was introduced,” and that he “didn’t want to complicate matters” with the terrorism bill. To his credit, he did say that banning Muslims is “not a good idea,” and that if the resolution had been introduced on its own rather than as an amendment to an unrelated bill, he would have sup-ported it. “As a stand-alone ‘sense of the Senate,’ I would vote for it,” Tillis said.

But Tillis’ “integrity of the process” nonsense would carry more weight if he didn’t vote “yes” just last week on two Senate amendments about guns that were tacked onto another bill repealing the Affordable Care Act, and if this tactic wasn’t an ingrained feature of Senate politics that both parties use readily. But he did, and it is. At the root of it, Thom Tillis declined to denounce religious testing, and when confronted, hid behind procedure. 

Tags: , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

I'm glad to hear that Steve Schewel [founder of indyweek] will retain his council seat
if he loses his …

by Chris Tiffany on Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Durham's Municipal Candidates (News)

It's spelled "Zainab Baloch".

by jason0x21 on Baldwin Bows Out of Raleigh At-large Race; All Council Candidates Have Opposition (News)

Most Recent Comments

I'm glad to hear that Steve Schewel [founder of indyweek] will retain his council seat
if he loses his …

by Chris Tiffany on Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Durham's Municipal Candidates (News)

It's spelled "Zainab Baloch".

by jason0x21 on Baldwin Bows Out of Raleigh At-large Race; All Council Candidates Have Opposition (News)

I live in Durham NC. We have a large growth in the last 6 years. The city have really gotten …

by Margaret Houston on Section 8 Voucher Holders Are Having a Hard Time Finding Housing in Durham (News)

@ Hunter23 "A combination of investors and loans" is not specific, and nowhere in the article is the phrase "private …

by RJO_III on North Carolina FC and John Kane Want to Put a Big Ol' Soccer Stadium in Downtown Raleigh (News)

The article clearly states the building would be privately funded with the state/local gov pitching in for infrastructure enhancement. The …

by Hunter23 on North Carolina FC and John Kane Want to Put a Big Ol' Soccer Stadium in Downtown Raleigh (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation