Judge denies North Carolina's motion to dismiss the case against voter ID | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Judge denies North Carolina's motion to dismiss the case against voter ID

Posted by on Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:00 PM

A pivotal legal challenge to North Carolina's much-criticized Voter ID law has cleared its last hurdle for trial.

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas D. Schroeder on Friday denied the state's motion to dismiss the case, which has been led by civil rights activists such as the N.C. NAACP and the Advancement Project, a coalition of civil rights attorneys.

The ruling was not unexpected. It follows a similar decision made in a separate claim against the law last month. 

The groups are arguing in court that the 2013 voter reforms will have the effect of reducing minority voting when it goes into effect next year, although GOP supporters have claimed the reforms are intended to reduce voter fraud.

State lawyers contended that the case should be dismissed due to revisions made this year that would allow voters without proper identification to cast a provisional ballot. Nope, said Schroeder. The case is expected to go to trial in January.

"Even with the changes, and after nearly two years of telling voters they would need the narrowly prescribed photo ID to vote, North Carolina officials have yet to articulate their strategy for educating the public, poll workers and other state officials on what is needed to vote," said attorney Irving Joyner, who is representing the challengers. "As a result, the people of North Carolina are left in legislative limbo by not knowing the rules for voting as well as the options available ahead of a March 2016 primary and the general election.”

Meanwhile, the Rev. William Barber, president of the N.C. NAACP, again stated that the voter ID would impose an "undue and unlawful burden on voters of color."

Voting rights advocates continue to await a decision on the other provisions of the controversial law, which includes a reduction in early voting times and an end to same-day registration and voting. The two sides argued over those provisions in July. 

Tags: , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Most Recent Comments

@jerryg so if the mayor has no power why should we vote then?

by snake00 on Runoff for Raleigh Mayor's Post May Be Ahead as Francis Denies McFarlane a Majority of Votes (News)

Cora landed the endorsements of the Durham Committee (DC) and the Friends (FD) for 10,400 votes.
Huggins with the DC …

by Frank Hyman on Cole-McFadden Survives Durham Council Primary, Moffitt Does Not (News)

Cora landed the endorsements of the Durham Committee (DC) and the Friends (FD) for 10,400 votes.
Huggins with the DC …

by Frank Hyman on Durham's Next Mayor Will Be Steve Schewel or Farad Ali (News)

Just because one of our two newly elected Council members is pro-neighborhood and natural resources, it does not qualify her …

by Meredith de la Vergne on Make Way for the NIMBY Raleigh City Council, as Newcomers Nicole Stewart and Stef Mendell Oust Bonner Gaylord and Defeat Stacy Miller (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation