Raleigh City Council will vote on changes to fuel sales in residential areas today | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Raleigh City Council will vote on changes to fuel sales in residential areas today

Posted by on Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:05 AM

fuel_sales.jpg

Gas stations—who needs ’em, right? Not in our backyards, thank you.

This sentiment is the essence of a text change approved by the City Council’s Comprehensive Planning Committee last week to limit fuel sales in certain residential areas—the full City Council will vote this afternoon whether to accept the committee's recommendation. (This particular zoning, NX, has also seen disputes over food trucks, which are presently not allowed, and bars, which can exist but can’t have dance floors).

The text change limits gas stations in several ways: it restricts hours of operation (for the pumps, not the convenience stores), proximity to homes and intersections, and the number of pumps allowed, as well as measures to limit noise and light pollution.

Not so onerous, right?

Wrong! Well, at least if you ask the Sheetz site selector, whose entire business model is basically being dumped on here.

Jamie Gerhart says the limit on hours of operation is arbitrary, and besides, don’t we live in a 24-hour society? “No North Carolina zoning district has across-the-board hours of operations restrictions,” he told the committee. “It sends an unwelcome signal to businesses.”

Gerhart found a sympathizer in Councilman Bonner Gaylord, who said forcing gas pumps to close at 11 is “silly,” when the rest of the station—its convenience store, for example—is allowed to stay open. Imagine the WTF scenario of a driver who shows up at 11:01 and realizes that, though the station looks open, he can’t actually get gas.

“I would think the City Council was a bunch of idiots,” Gaylord said.

We think that all the time, councilman. (Oh, pipe down. We kid because we love.)

Anyway, point taken, but if you’re a resident, especially one with kids, the gas station rules don’t go far enough. What about those people who drive up with their “boomboxes” blasting (because it’s 1995 up in here) and their windows open?, a resident wondered. This is a quality of life issue.

Resident Michi Vojta told the committee she doesn’t think any kind of 24/7 operation should be allowed next to homes. “It’s ridiculous to say when you’re running out of gas, you can’t drive two miles” to the nearest pump, said Vojta, who clearly never lets her gauge dip below E.

The only folks happy with the text change were the small convenience store-gas station combos, the Mom-and-Pops that close early anyway and already meet most of the regulations the change would impose. (And if they don’t, they’d be grandfathered in, so NBD.)

No wonder attorney Tom Worth, who represents some of these small gas stations including Erwin Oil Co., called the text change “a compromise between the neighborhood side and the industry side.”

 Hey, at least someone was happy.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation