N.C. Senate gives initial OK to bill repealing protest petitions | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

N.C. Senate gives initial OK to bill repealing protest petitions

Posted by on Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:14 PM

rezoning_protest.jpg

Shine up your pitchforks, North Carolina citizens; they’re likely the only tool you’ll have left in fighting unwanted developments in your neighborhoods.

The state Senate voted 39-9 in favor of a bill to repeal zoning protest petitions Wednesday afternoon, after the bill cleared the Senate Commerce Committee on short notice Tuesday.

“This bill in no way eliminates a citizen’s right to protest,” said Sen. Andy Wells, R-Alexander and Catawba, a supporter of the bill on the Senate floor.

Actually, that is exactly what it does.

While citizens can still submit comments to their municipal governing bodies against a proposed rezoning (like they could before, because free speech), they would no longer have any formal bargaining power with their local leaders and deep-pocketed developers if this bill becomes law. That's exactly what the state’s real estate development community—groups like the North Carolina Homebuilders Association, the Real Estate and Building Industry Coalition, the NAIOP Commercial Real Estate Development Association and the Apartment Association—has been angling for.  

“Opponents of protest petitions have set this bill up as a David vs. Goliath battle of struggling business owners up against well-organized, well-informed activists aided by a mountain of archaic rules and admissible bureaucrats,” said Sen. Mike Woodard, D-Durham. “In reality those roles are reversed. Protest petitions level the playing field between ordinary citizens trying to protect their homes and small business owners trying to protect their places of business.”

After he reiterated how seldom protest petitions are actually used in rezoning cases—they are filed 6 percent of the time, according to a UNC School of Government study— Woodard introduced an amendment that lowered the threshold of votes needed on a city or town council to pass a rezoning, and increased the threshold of neighbors who could sign on to a protest petition.

Wells argued that, in his experience, protest petitions are used “most extensively” against affordable housing developments, but didn’t elaborate or offer examples.

“Protest petitions puts power in the hands of unelected officials to change the threshold of a vote count,” said Sen. Mike Lee, R-New Hanover. “That private individual, there’s no judicial review. They could be doing it for any purpose. An illegal purpose, an unethical purposes, a purpose against public policy, a racially motivated purpose.”

The Woodard amendment failed. The bill will be up for a final vote in the Senate tomorrow, then heads to the Governor’s desk.



Tags: , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Mr. Goldsmith, please read Jennifer's post below. If you have journalistic integrity, please fix your blog as it shows up …

by Sherry D. on Mayor McFarlane Will Not Be Turned Away from Democratic Party Events, Spokesman Says (News)

Look Lisa, your grandfather's story is tough. I would suggest however that he is a victim of capitalist oppression, not …

by CPF (CommiePinkoFag) on “Durham’s a Bright Light for Our Movement”: After Their Cases Were Continued Until November, Defend Durham Activists Took a Victory Lap (News)

Most Recent Comments

Mr. Goldsmith, please read Jennifer's post below. If you have journalistic integrity, please fix your blog as it shows up …

by Sherry D. on Mayor McFarlane Will Not Be Turned Away from Democratic Party Events, Spokesman Says (News)

Look Lisa, your grandfather's story is tough. I would suggest however that he is a victim of capitalist oppression, not …

by CPF (CommiePinkoFag) on “Durham’s a Bright Light for Our Movement”: After Their Cases Were Continued Until November, Defend Durham Activists Took a Victory Lap (News)

Apparently we must hope that the N&O doesn't follow through on this trend by deciding that they will cover legislative …

by khoragos on The N&O’s Performing Arts Correspondent Says the Paper Is Cutting Back on Performing Arts Reviews (News)

Cancelling the parade affects all people. I usually went just for the parade, not the night events. Parents take their …

by Aiden on Carolina Jews for Justice Says NC Pride Schedule Fix Isn't Enough (News)

I should also add that it was professor Daniel Sherman who penned the letter that we all signed after some …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation