N.C. House delays vote on gun bill, again | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Monday, June 8, 2015

N.C. House delays vote on gun bill, again

Posted by on Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:10 PM

Worried they wouldn't get the votes needed to repeal the state's pistol permitting system and further loosen other gun control measures Monday evening, wingnuts in the House again delayed a vote on House Bill 562.

"This bill's got a lot of moving parts," Rep. Jacqueline Schaffer, (R-Mecklenburg), a sponsor, told House Speaker Tim Moore before he granted her request to send the bill back to the House Rules Committee for further review. 

Schaffer's right to be worried. Members of her own party, including pro-gun Rep. Leo Daughtry of Johnston County voted against the bill initially in Rules, which it passed last week by one vote. Gov. McCrory has said he opposes the bill as well.

The cornerstone of the bill to amend firearms laws is a provision that would do away with the state's pistol permit application system, whereby anyone who wants to buy a handgun currently, from either a federally-licensed arms dealer or a private individual, has to obtain a pistol purchase permit from their county sheriff or a state-issued concealed handgun permit.

Instead, starting in 2018, federally-licensed arms dealers would need only to run a a screening through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NCIS) before selling handguns, and by 2021, there would be no regulation on gun sales between private parties. 

If that sounds crazy to you, you're not alone. 

The North Carolina Sheriff's Association has come out strongly against the bill, arguing that it would be easier for the wrong kinds of people to access firearms. They say background checks undertaken by sheriffs when handgun permits are issued are more comprehensive than the national system's. Sales of firearms at gun shows also require a sheriff's permit currently; without the pistol permit, there would be no official way to track who is buying firearms.

The bill also would allow lawmakers and their staff to carry handguns in the legislative buildings; it would allow some judges and prosecutors to bring permitted handguns into courtrooms; it would citizens to sue their cities and counties for enacting ordinances that contradict the bill if it passes; it would allow non-violent misdemeanants to obtain obtain handgun permits and would reduce the penalty for bringing a firearm into a prohibited space from a misdemeanor to a minor infraction with a maximum $500 penalty.

And, in a  nod to the reasonable, the commissioner of agriculture would be given the discretion to ban bringing handguns into the state fair.

Expect a vote on the bill late this week or next. 





Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation