N.C. lawmakers to state justices: slow your role in reviewing controversial redistricting case | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, April 30, 2015

N.C. lawmakers to state justices: slow your role in reviewing controversial redistricting case

Posted by on Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:57 PM

North Carolina Republicans have asked the state's Supreme Court justices not to hurry in reviewing the state’s redistricting case, because of course they have. It won’t do those lawmakers any good when the justices strike down the redistricting law—sent back to the state's highest court by the U.S. Supreme Court last week, because it packs minorities into certain districts—right in time for the 2016 elections.

According to NC Policy Watch, a left-leaning blog, lawmakers on Tuesday filed papers asking the state Supreme Court not to comply with a request from challengers to redistricting to expedite review of the redistricting lawsuit, Dickson v. Rucho, again, in time for 2016.

Redistricting opponents want the expedited review following a SCOTUS ruling on a similar redistricting case out of Alabama, in which the justices ruled that the Voting Rights Act requires lawmakers to determine whether or not minorities have the ability to choose their preferred candidate and to draw district lines accordingly. In Alabama’s case, as in North Carolina’s, lines were drawn to achieve a high concentration of black voters in a few districts. 

Lawmakers challenging the expedited review say they need more time to work on arguments for their case for redistricting that, as the Progressive Pulse blog notes, they already had prepared for the courts when they redrew the districts in the first place. They also cite scheduling conflicts with trial dates in federal voter suppression cases connected to the 2013 “election reform” law which disenfranchises virtually everyone. 

Thankfully, the North Carolina legislative branch doesn’t get to tell the judicial branch what to do. State Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Martin isn’t one to drag his feet, and he could schedule expedited review of the lawsuit as early as this summer.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

I am glad to hear this news. it is good to have debates.
I am a fan of both …

by 2Lionsrock on Raleigh Mayoral Rivals Nancy McFarlane, Charles Francis to Tape Debate That Will Air Friday and Sunday (News)

Most Recent Comments

I am glad to hear this news. it is good to have debates.
I am a fan of both …

by 2Lionsrock on Raleigh Mayoral Rivals Nancy McFarlane, Charles Francis to Tape Debate That Will Air Friday and Sunday (News)

Where has Francis been the last 20 years in Raleigh politics? He shows up now and has all the answers? …

by GET REAL on McFarlane Bashes Francis for Speaking to Wake GOP Meeting, Links Him With Trump (News)

She's never been here before. She's been reelected over and over apparently. Taking cheap shots will not work. She needs …

by that1chick on McFarlane Bashes Francis for Speaking to Wake GOP Meeting, Links Him With Trump (News)

@snake00 - You forgot to point out how much money Francis received from large Republican donors. What has that political …

by JerrryG on Runoff for Raleigh Mayor's Post May Be Ahead as Francis Denies McFarlane a Majority of Votes (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation