Breaking: N.C. House leadership says religious freedom bill won't be addressed this session | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Breaking: N.C. House leadership says religious freedom bill won't be addressed this session

Posted by on Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:46 PM

tim_moore.jpg
In the spirit of taking the good with the bad today, we are grateful that House Speaker Tim Moore and the Republican caucus came to their senses: Moore announced in a press conference this afternoon that the House will not take up the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in the 2015-2016 legislative session.

(Gov. McCrory is also, probably, very grateful).

We’ve gone over and over how the bill would function effectively as a state-sanctioned license to discriminate against the LGBT community, by allowing citizens to object to municipal and county laws they say run counter to their religious beliefs. After the same kind of legislation imploded in Indiana last month when Gov. Mike Pence signed it into law, McCrory took note.

Businesses, including Red Hat, IBM and U.S. Airways, which employ thousands of North Carolina residents, as well as faith leaders and LGBT advocacy groups like Equality North Carolina, vociferously condemned the bill. So did North Carolina voters: activists took 10,000 signed petitions to McCrory’s offices on Monday urging him not to give his signature to the law if it made it to his desk.

And now it won’t go to the Governor’s desk, at least not any time soon, because House leaders seem to have agreed with the Governor: the law makes no sense. 

“Today, true North Carolina values of fairness and justice prevailed,” said Chris Sgro, the executive director of Equality NC. “This decision is a testament to the actions of thousands of North Carolinians who made their voices heard over the past few months, who pushed back on the notion that religious freedom should never be used to discriminate.”

But we shouldn’t get too excited just yet.

Senate Bill 2, which would allow state magistrates to opt out of performing one of their job duties— marrying couples— based on a stated religious objection, is still on the table, and Moore said something to the effect of "people seem to agree about it" this afternoon.

“We remain focused on continuing to fight a law that would allow public officials to discriminate against same-sex couples, advocating for proposed legislation that would finally provide statewide protections in employment for tens of thousands of LGBT North Carolinians, and fighting to keep our state on the right side of the RFRA debate, and history, in this legislative session and beyond,” Sgro said. 



Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation