Greystone Inn apartments: big, bulky and we'll say it, ugly | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Monday, October 6, 2014

Greystone Inn apartments: big, bulky and we'll say it, ugly

Posted by on Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:10 AM

The project is still too big.

That’s the takeaway from a revised report about the proposed Greystone Inn Apartments, issued by Durham planning department.



Lomax Properties of Greensboro, the developers of a proposed apartment complex at Duke Street and Morehead Avenue, have improved some aspects of the project, but it still has 140 units. It still has three buildings. And it still does not meet all the standards to be built in the Morehead Hill Historic District.

The Historic Preservation Commission will hear the revised proposal on Tuesday morning at 8:30 in the second floor conference room of Durham City Hall. Since the development is proposed for the Morehead Hill Historic District, it must go before the commission to receive a certificate of appropriateness before it can be built.

As the INDY reported in August, Lomax Properties and Horvath Associates, a Durham civil engineering/land planning firm, want to construct the Greystone Inn apartments on a 3.6-acre grassy meadow next to the historic Greystone Inn. Under the plan, the inn, built in 1911, would become a clubhouse and conference center.

A Greensboro developer wants to build 140 apartments in three buildings on this meadow next to the historic Greystone Inn. The inn would become a conference center and clubhouse. - LISA SORG
  • Lisa Sorg
  • A Greensboro developer wants to build 140 apartments in three buildings on this meadow next to the historic Greystone Inn. The inn would become a conference center and clubhouse.


While the revised proposal heeds some of the commission’s previous recommendations—it eliminates a path between the apartments and the inn, moves the swimming pool, switches the window hangings from vinyl to aluminum, and saves eight trees along Morehead Avenue—the size and mass of the project remains a concern. (Judging from architectural renderings in the report, the apartment buildings resemble a Marriott.)

At three and four stories, the apartment buildings would tower over the smaller single-family homes in the neighborhood. At nine stories, the JJ Henderson Housing Center sits diagonally from the proposed site. But Henderson Towers, as it’s known, lies outside of the district. The Durham Housing Authority owns the property.

The analysis did acknowledge that since the proposed apartments are on the edge of the district and along a major thoroug fare—the Durham freeway runs below and behind the land—larger structures could be built there. However, the mass of the buildings still “visually dominate the existing streetscape” and the density would “alter the pastoral character of the landmark site,” the report said. 

At an August hearing, the commission criticized the project for failing to meet even the minimum guidelines. "I would have no idea they even knew we have historic guidelines," said HPC member James Leis on Aug. 5. "There was no indication it was on the radar."

The developers then asked for a continuance until tomorrow’s meeting. In August, Randall Brame, who owns the property, told the INDY he would sue the city if it prevents the project from being approved.






Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Mr. Goldsmith, please read Jennifer's post below. If you have journalistic integrity, please fix your blog as it shows up …

by Sherry D. on Mayor McFarlane Will Not Be Turned Away from Democratic Party Events, Spokesman Says (News)

Look Lisa, your grandfather's story is tough. I would suggest however that he is a victim of capitalist oppression, not …

by CPF (CommiePinkoFag) on “Durham’s a Bright Light for Our Movement”: After Their Cases Were Continued Until November, Defend Durham Activists Took a Victory Lap (News)

Most Recent Comments

Mr. Goldsmith, please read Jennifer's post below. If you have journalistic integrity, please fix your blog as it shows up …

by Sherry D. on Mayor McFarlane Will Not Be Turned Away from Democratic Party Events, Spokesman Says (News)

Look Lisa, your grandfather's story is tough. I would suggest however that he is a victim of capitalist oppression, not …

by CPF (CommiePinkoFag) on “Durham’s a Bright Light for Our Movement”: After Their Cases Were Continued Until November, Defend Durham Activists Took a Victory Lap (News)

Apparently we must hope that the N&O doesn't follow through on this trend by deciding that they will cover legislative …

by khoragos on The N&O’s Performing Arts Correspondent Says the Paper Is Cutting Back on Performing Arts Reviews (News)

Cancelling the parade affects all people. I usually went just for the parade, not the night events. Parents take their …

by Aiden on Carolina Jews for Justice Says NC Pride Schedule Fix Isn't Enough (News)

I should also add that it was professor Daniel Sherman who penned the letter that we all signed after some …

by elin o'Hara slavick on UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Sam (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation