Federal judges strike key parts of N.C. voting reforms | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Federal judges strike key parts of N.C. voting reforms

Posted by on Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:46 PM

As expected, federal judges with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down key provisions of last year's controversial voting reforms approved by the N.C. General Assembly.

The decision, handed down by a panel of three judges—all of which were appointed by Democratic presidents—lifts the legislation's ban on same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting. As Think Progress noted Monday, Judge James Wynn, a North Carolina native, seemed particularly riled by the GOP's move to strike the use of provisional ballots for voters who turned up at the wrong precinct.

However, the ruling upholds a number of other important portions of the bill. Most importantly, it retains the General Assembly's decision to shorten the state's early voting period.

"The court's order safeguards the vote for tens of thousands of North Carolinians," said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, in a statement Wednesday. "It means they will continue to be able to use same-day registration, just as they have during the last three federal elections."

Not everyone was pleased. Kim Strach, executive director of the State Board of Elections, said she worries the ruling will cause confusion this close to Election Day. “More than 4 million voter guides have gone to the public with information contrary to today’s decision," Strach said in a statement.

State officials are expected to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday.

Tags: , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Who would have believed that HIV/AIDS is curable, I have been living with HIV for close to 20 years until …

by Tyson Hurley on Study: N.C. among 10 states with highest HIV infection, death rates (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Who would have believed that HIV/AIDS is curable, I have been living with HIV for close to 20 years until …

by Tyson Hurley on Study: N.C. among 10 states with highest HIV infection, death rates (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation