N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper blasts Aqua North Carolina, utilities commission on interim rate hikes | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, July 3, 2014

N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper blasts Aqua North Carolina, utilities commission on interim rate hikes

Posted by on Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:18 AM

In a scorching eight-page appeal, N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper said Aqua North Carolina should be prohibited from raising water and sewer rates without public hearings. Cooper filed the appeal, which will be sent to the N.C. Supreme Court, yesterday.

Earlier this year, the N.C. Utilities Commission approved what is known as a surcharge mechanism that allows the private company to increase rates in 5 percent increments between regular rate requests. As the INDY reported in May, the mechanism is not subject to public hearings and input, unlike other rate requests. The surcharge is subject only to internal review at the utilities commission.

The utility has justified the surcharge by saying the extra money will be used to improve water quality.

Aqua NC owns 800 water and/or sewer systems and serves 90,000 households, making it the largest private water and sewer utility in the state. Aqua customers already pay among the highest utility rates in North Carolina. Customers have complained that water quality, as the INDY has extensively reported, is poor.
This water came from the faucet at Nammack Weiss' home in Chapel Hill. She is an Aqua NC customer. - AMY NAMMACK WEISS
  • Amy Nammack Weiss
  • This water came from the faucet at Nammack Weiss' home in Chapel Hill. She is an Aqua NC customer.


At public hearings and in letters to the commission, Aqua customers throughout the state have opposed a rate hike.

Cooper's office questioned the justification for the surcharge, saying Aqua NC doesn't need an incentive to provide quality water to its customers. "The commission already has the ability to require Aqua to provide clean, drinkable water."

Aqua North Carolina responded to the appeal in a statement yesterday.

The company said the public staff and the utilities commission can still review projects funded by the surcharge. It also said the surcharge would help tame "regulatory and legal expenses," which are passed on to customers.

The company is a subsidiary of Aqua America, one of the largest private utilities in the U.S. Its stock is publicly traded and the company has shareholders. The surcharge, the appeal said, would benefit the company's shareholders, but not the public: "The benefit to Aqua and its shareholders is concrete, while the supposed benefit to the public is not concrete or guaranteed."

There were several other significant flaws in the commission's rulings, the appeal said. The ruling denied a request that the commission conduct or order a study examining these mechanisms in other states. Nor will the commission order an audit to understand how Aqua prioritizes its improvements and "why prior rate increases and investment decisions have not resulted in acceptable water quality."

The commission approved the surcharge mechanism on top of a 5.2 percent increase, lower than the 19 percent Aqua NC had originally requested. This was the company's third rate hike in six years.

In ruling Aqua could assess the surcharge, the utilities commission relied on a law passed by the N.C. Legislature last year. That law is similar to those in eight other states allowing the surcharge. In many cases, lobbyists for Aqua America, the parent company, helped draft the language.

Here is the INDY's previous coverage of Aqua:
"Water utility surcharge rules won't protect ratepayers"
"Why Aqua customers are furious about their service"
"Aqua North Carolina found a legal way to raise its rates—at customers' expense"
"Durham tries to prevent Aqua NC from reselling water to 751 South"

Food & Water Watch also has a synopsis of Aqua America's strategies.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Most Recent Comments

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

#1. it isn't reported in this article. Was Mr. de la Rosa a legal resident?
#2. I know attacking ICE …

by Timothy Oswald on A Raleigh Man Died of an Apparent Suicide While in Solitary Confinement at a For-Profit Immigration Prison in Georgia (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation