Fired over shower episode, Wake County detention officer loses lawsuit | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Friday, June 27, 2014

Fired over shower episode, Wake County detention officer loses lawsuit

Posted by on Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:30 AM

One of the area's odder cases was dismissed in federal court this month when a judge upheld the termination of a female Wake County Detention Center officer who stood next to a naked inmate while he showered. 

The judge's ruling wraps up the gender discrimination lawsuit that plaintiff Monifa Gethers had filed against Wake County Sheriff Donnie Harrison.

On Jan. 5, 2010, a prisoner at the Raleigh detention center smeared himself with feces and wrapped himself in a blanket. Gethers, a sergeant, claimed she helped escort him to the shower. Two male officers claimed they told Gethers that her presence was no longer necessary once the inmate was inside the shower, but that she refused to leave. Gethers, however, alleged the two officers never explicitly gave her those instructions, and that she was positioned inside the shower so that she could not see the naked prisoner. 

Detention center policy mandates that employees shouldn't be present when an opposite-sex inmate showers or is naked. That policy, however, does not appear to be anywhere in writing, nor was it distributed to staff. 

Earlier in the day of the shower incident, the same prisoner had spread feces on his body and the walls of another cell. While other officers donned protective gear and prepared to extract the prisoner, Gethers had walked to the prisoner's cell by herself, removed him and placed him in a holding cell. Her captain later praised her for handling the situation so diligently. Harrison, however, would note that Gethers' action presented a serious risk to Gethers, other officers and other prisoners. (The prisoner was agitated and had a history of assaultive behavior.)

When Sheriff Donnie Harrison learned about the shower incident, he launched an investigation. The following month he demoted Gethers. During a follow-up meeting with Harrison, Gethers denied that she could see the prisoner nude. Harrison determined that Gethers was being untruthful, and he fired her, prompting Gethers to sue.

Harrison filed a motion to dismiss the case. Earlier this month, Senior District Judge Judge James C. Cox sided with Harrison. 

"In employment of this type, a policy prohibiting women from being in the shower area while a male prisoner showers is simply not discriminatory," Cox wrote in his order. "The nature of the employment requires some gender-specific policies designed to protect the privacy and dignity of the inmates. 

Gethers' claim that she never saw the inmate naked while she was standing in the shower area, Cox added, "is largely beside the point. The purpose of the policy is to provide inmates some degree of privacy and respect when they are nude." 


Tags: , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Most Recent Comments

Retaliatory fines for activities that are clearly permitted per the posted signage in that court should subject the IJ to …

by Karin Wolman on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Perhaps the appeal will succeed, but judges are usually reluctant to interfere with another judge's discretion to run a courtroom …

by ct on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

Wow. This article and the pronouncements by the city council are so staggeringly contrary to reality it would be commical. …

by Craig Stump on City Council Calls on Durham to “Resist Bigotry,” Recommit to Inclusive Values Ahead of Jordan Peterson's DPAC Show (News)

Prosecuting this attorney is a misuse of government resources at a minimum, and at a maximum is retaliatory prosecution that …

by Toni Maschler on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

This is something I've never liked. Judges have far too much power in the legal system, which was never the …

by Timothy Oswald on Raleigh Immigration Attorney Gets $2,510 Fine for Texting in Court (News)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation