Orgs behind protest petition criticize county attorney's ruling | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Friday, November 6, 2009

Orgs behind protest petition criticize county attorney's ruling

Posted by on Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:46 PM

The Southern Environmental Law Center and Haw River Assembly, two groups that filed a protest petition last month in an attempt to prevent changes to the protected area around Jordan Lake, responded this morning to the county's final ruling that the petition was invalid. They criticized the county's findings, its evaluation process and its statement that further appeal of the decision would have to be presented in a lawsuit.

"That doesn’t give citizens a role in democracy that they should have," said Elaine Chiosso of the Haw River Assembly. "Suing a local govt is a very expensive proposition. It puts a very big barrier in front of citizens who are trying to hold their government accountable."

The county issued a press release late Thursday saying County Attorney Lowell Siler found the petition invalid, and that included a problem with the signatures. Chiosso said they're still waiting for the county to explain what that means. (So are we. We promise to update when we hear back.)

UPDATE - 4:30 p.m. - Kay Bond, a lawyer with the Southern Environmental Law Center who is representing the Haw River Assembly, clarified what Chiosso told us earlier. Corrections below:

Chiosso said a problem with signatures is probably tied to a Chancellor's Ridge resident who signed the petition for herself as well as for her parents. But that property shouldn't even be considered, Chiosso said, because the petitioners were required to gather signatures of property owners of at least 20 percent of the land on one side (north, south, east or west) of a buffer area around the land to be rezoned, and the petitioners believe they exceeded the 20-percent threshold on the east side. The petition focused on the west side, and exceeded the 20 percent requirement, Chiosso said. The property with questionable signatures was on the east side, and doesn't even count. so if it doesn't count, there should still be enough valid signatures, Bond said.

Chiosso said neither organization behind the petition has decided yet whether they'll file a lawsuit.

Why does this all matter? Because had the petition been valid, it would have made it harder for county commissioners to pass the rezoning of the protected buffer around Jordan Lake. Residents in protest of the rezoning (including the petitioners) don't want development so close to the lake, which is a water source for thousands of residents. A developer and his supporters say that the development planned for the area will greatly benefit the county and its residents.

Here is the text of the HRA and SELC release from this morning:

Jordan Lake Petition Response Raises Questions

County Ignores Its Mistakes, Invalidates without Specifics and Dares Citizens to Sue

CHAPEL HILL, NC—After Durham County miscounted properties belonging to petition signatories, its announcement yesterday that a citizens’ petition is invalid without specific explanation and citizens must sue for reconsideration only raises questions, according to the Southern Environmental Law Center and Haw River Assembly.

“It’s unfortunate that the county insists on court action by citizens for proper consideration of their petition instead of insisting on good and transparent governance,” said Kay Bond, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center.

“The county’s dogged invalidation of a citizens’ petition without specific explanation and following its previous miscount is perplexing,” added Elaine Chiosso, Haw Riverkeeper, Haw River Assembly. “If the only way to achieve government accountability and transparency to citizens is through the courts, Durham’s in sad shape.”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

It's spelled "Zainab Baloch".

by jason0x21 on Baldwin Bows Out of Raleigh At-large Race; All Council Candidates Have Opposition (News)

I live in Durham NC. We have a large growth in the last 6 years. The city have really gotten …

by Margaret Houston on Section 8 Voucher Holders Are Having a Hard Time Finding Housing in Durham (News)

Most Recent Comments

It's spelled "Zainab Baloch".

by jason0x21 on Baldwin Bows Out of Raleigh At-large Race; All Council Candidates Have Opposition (News)

I live in Durham NC. We have a large growth in the last 6 years. The city have really gotten …

by Margaret Houston on Section 8 Voucher Holders Are Having a Hard Time Finding Housing in Durham (News)

@ Hunter23 "A combination of investors and loans" is not specific, and nowhere in the article is the phrase "private …

by RJO_III on North Carolina FC and John Kane Want to Put a Big Ol' Soccer Stadium in Downtown Raleigh (News)

The article clearly states the building would be privately funded with the state/local gov pitching in for infrastructure enhancement. The …

by Hunter23 on North Carolina FC and John Kane Want to Put a Big Ol' Soccer Stadium in Downtown Raleigh (News)

I truly admire the passion and support the message. But it seems standing on an overpass during rush hour traffic …

by Diane Alenezi on High Above I-40, Protesters Call for "Health Care 4 All" (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation