Online at WRAL: N.C. Supreme Court hears case on doctors & executions | News
News
INDY Week's news blog

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Online at WRAL: N.C. Supreme Court hears case on doctors & executions

Posted by on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:53 PM

For nearly a century, state law has required that a physician be "present" during executions. But does present mean merely that a doctor is on hand to pronounce death, as it doubtless did in 1909 when the state centralized executions in Raleigh and started using the electric chair instead of hangings? Or does present mean, now that lethal injections have replaced the chair, that the doctor is available to take an active role?

The legal dispute over that issue, as fought out between the N.C. Medical Board and the Easley Administration's Department of Corrections -- represented by the Attorney General -- has created a de facto moratorium on capital punishment here since August, 2006. The dispute reached the N.C. Supreme Court today. Oral arguments, an hour long, can be viewed online at WRAL.com.

The Medical Board, a state-created agency with the power to govern doctors' practices and discipline them for violating medical ethics, argues that physicians cannot ethically play a role in executions and were never expected  to -- or else, what role were they supposed to play in an electrocution?

The Attorney General maintains, though, that a doctor's presence was required for humane reasons, not just to sign the death certificate. And now that the law specifies executions by lethal injection in accordance with a protocol (set of procedures) developed by the warden of Central Prison and approved by the Council of State, the physician who is present must follow the protocol. It requires the physician to monitor the prisoner's condition so that, after an anethetic drug is administered followed by a paralyzing agent, he remains unconscious while the lethal drug is injected. Otherwise, the prisoner would experience excruciating pain prior to death.

Given that the Medical Board is operating under one law and the Department of Corrections another, and given that the meaning of the word present in the latter statute isn't clear, Justice Patricia Timmons-Goodson asked Deputy Attorney General Joseph Finarelli a pertinent question:

Why shouldn't the Court construe the meaning of present very strictly -- not read anything into it, not legislate from the bench -- and resist the temptation to do the legislature's job for it, she asked. Let the General Assembly decide, in other words.

"Why shouldn't we just send this right on over there where it belongs?" Timmons-Goodson wondered.

Tags: ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in News



Twitter Activity

Comments

I totally agree with this topic. The Senators should not be like rubber stamps and they should be themselves. They …

by Greengoldlandscaping on After the INDY’s Report About Judicial Nominee Thomas Farr Misleading a Senate Committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein Wants Answers (News)

We must take our nation back from the brink of hate, stupidity, violence, corruption & decay. That means dismantling either …

by Allison Moss-Fritch on Did Former Helms Lawyer Thomas Farr Lie to the Senate Judiciary Committee? It Sure Looks That Way. (News)

Most Read

Most Recent Comments

I totally agree with this topic. The Senators should not be like rubber stamps and they should be themselves. They …

by Greengoldlandscaping on After the INDY’s Report About Judicial Nominee Thomas Farr Misleading a Senate Committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein Wants Answers (News)

We must take our nation back from the brink of hate, stupidity, violence, corruption & decay. That means dismantling either …

by Allison Moss-Fritch on Did Former Helms Lawyer Thomas Farr Lie to the Senate Judiciary Committee? It Sure Looks That Way. (News)

How i got my Desired Loan Amount from a Reliable Loan Company (Adolfloancompany@yahoo.com)

Good day everybody am Ketesha …

by Ketesha Frank on Durham City Council Votes to Provide Grants to Some Southside Residents Struggling with Property Tax Bills (News)

This is real take it serious, who will believe that a herbal can cure six years HIV in my body, …

by paul fliks on Study: N.C. among 10 states with highest HIV infection, death rates (News)

Only republicans can be sexist! John Edwards said so! #staywoke

by lamer99 on Dammit, Al Franken (News)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation