Will Durham finally tackle affordable housing downtown? | Triangulator | Indy Week
Pin It

Will Durham finally tackle affordable housing downtown? 

click to enlarge gallery2.jpg

File photo by D.L. Anderson

The city of Durham, as has been well documented in these pages, has something of an affordable housing problem. This is especially true around downtown, where new luxury condo towers seem to sprout from the ground every other day.

As has also been well documented, city leaders have for a while now declared their desire to do something about it. Early last year, in fact, the City Council passed a resolution professing a goal of having 15 percent of housing units within a half-mile of Durham Station be affordable.

Since then, at least 1,190 units in that area have gone online or entered the pipeline. None are affordable.

In its work session Thursday—1 p.m. on the second floor of City Hall, if you're interested—Council will have a chance to begin addressing that gap. The question is whether they'll take it. City staff would rather they didn't.

At issue is a city-owned 2.15-acre site just south of Durham Station, excess land that the N.C. Department of Transportation greenlighted for development in April. Housing advocates want it set aside for affordable housing. Self-Help, a nonprofit credit union, says that, once it procures Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, it could build 80 to 100 affordable units on that site.

"There's a whole lot of private development around downtown," says Dan Levine, director of business development and project management at Self-Help. "It's important to look for opportunities when affordable housing can happen. It's not going to happen with the free market."

But, as is ever the case with affordable housing, it's not that simple: The state typically only awards tax credits to just one Durham organization per year. This year, two want to apply, Self-Help and the Durham Housing Authority, which is seeking funds for a different project. Without the LITHC money—an $8 million to $9 million subsidy—this affordable housing development will be untenable, Levine says. (The deadline to apply for those tax credits is January, so haste is of the essence.)

And there's also something to be said for the staff-favored alternative: a privately developed mixed-use project that may or may not include what city documents describe as "a limited percentage" of affordable units, depending on the conditions Council imposes, but would align with the city's goal of increasing density and bringing more commercial space downtown.

This option is "likely to yield the greatest overall benefit to Durham residents," Kevin Dick, director of the city's Office of Economic and Workforce Development, wrote in a memo to Council last week.

"There are genuine advantages [to staff's choice]," admits Councilman Steve Schewel, who supports putting affordable units on that parcel. "We need to weigh those against the need for affordable housing."

Those two options—a mixed-use and an all-affordable development—are among five that will be presented to Council. The others are a mixed-income development and selling the land to the highest bidder with either few or no restrictions. Schewel believes Council is most likely to go with one of the first two.

While the allure of another mixed-use project is real, affordable-housing advocates argue that this is a golden opportunity the city shouldn't pass up.

"In Durham, the city time after time gets to see developers propose high-end developments," says Ivan Parra, lead organizer for Durham CAN. "They can't obligate developers to build a certain percentage of those to be affordable."

This case is different, Parra adds: The city owns the land, so the city can call the shots. Unless, of course, it chooses not to.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Triangulator

Twitter Activity


From Letterman to The View, there were a lot of people who gave him an outlet to promote white supremacy …

by CB77 on A History of Donald Trump’s Racism, Abridged (Triangulator)


by John Trololo on A History of Donald Trump’s Racism, Abridged (Triangulator)

Most Recent Comments

From Letterman to The View, there were a lot of people who gave him an outlet to promote white supremacy …

by CB77 on A History of Donald Trump’s Racism, Abridged (Triangulator)


by John Trololo on A History of Donald Trump’s Racism, Abridged (Triangulator)

Might add for alternate weeklies to finally since it is 2018 should be a part of the N.C. Press Association …

by triadwatch on Here Are 18 Things We Want to See Happen in 2018 (Triangulator)

This article is ridiculous. Since when do all the councilors have to vote for committee's just because that's who the …

by Apache101 on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

does Fuquay-varina lack open space? Calabrias should have recused himself.

by margaretS on Over Their Own Staff’s Objection, Wake Commissioners Move Forward With a $23 Million Park (Triangulator)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation