Watch the throne: Three young, credible challengers seek to upend the Raleigh City Council | Wake County | Indy Week
Pin It

Watch the throne: Three young, credible challengers seek to upend the Raleigh City Council 

click to enlarge Raleigh's young guns

Illustration by Skillet Gilmore

Raleigh's young guns

One thing Matt Tomasulo says about the upcoming elections in Raleigh is undoubtedly true: The young challengers would bring fresh perspectives to the bristling growth issues that are close to a boil on a fractious City Council.

"Right now, it's pretty hostile," Tomasulo offers.

Hostile? Sure. Think downtown drinking and noise. Think the reviled Unified Development Ordinance. Think downtown rezoning and the issue of whether to approve buildings up to 40 stories without negotiating for design amenities, retail space or contributions to affordable housing.

Also true: October's municipal election features the strongest group of younger candidates in many years, including: Tomasulo, running in a four-way race for two at-large seats currently held by Mary-Ann Baldwin and Russ Stephenson, both of whom are seeking re-election; Corey Branch, trying to unseat Eugene Weeks in District C (Southeast Raleigh); and Ashton Mae Smith, up against Kay Crowder in District D (Southwest Raleigh).

These challengers are bright, self-confident and eager to serve. All believe new blood is needed, if only to reflect Raleigh's growing numbers of young people. All appear to be running campaigns with a shot at winning.

That said, they're not interchangeable. And there's a huge difference in the incumbents they might replace. Thus, depending on what you think the problem is in Raleigh, electing the young folks could help your cause or harm it.

On top of which, you can't separate the candidates by party. Branch and Weeks are Democrats. Tomasulo and Smith are unaffiliated, as is Mayor Nancy McFarlane.

But McFarlane's closest allies on Council are Stephenson and Crowder, both Democrats. Baldwin, a frequent McFarlane rival, is also a Democrat. (On the ballot, no parties are listed—it's ostensibly a nonpartisan election.)

Instead of party, the dividing line is growth and how to manage it—or not. The crude but useful division is between the "pro-neighborhoods" and "pro-developers" camps—between those who rarely question a developer's project and those who want those projects to "fit" their surroundings and advance the city's goals.

My bias is no secret: I'm on the neighborhoods' side. I think Raleigh is too quick to settle for scattered, mediocre development that undermines our ability to establish a first-rate transit system, provide affordable housing and build an inclusive city. And I'm friends with Stephenson and Crowder, Council's leading advocates for neighborhoods.

But the challengers are also saying good things about transit, housing and raising the bar for development. And talking about the poor job city government does of communicating with residents, and about the need to reach out beyond the usual suspects to gather input from people who can add to the decision-making process.

The more people who get involved, the three all say, the better the decisions. Especially missing in the process right now: young people.



Comments (44)

Showing 1-25 of 44

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-25 of 44

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Wake County



Twitter Activity

Comments

Too often when things like this happen that are detrimental to property owners and neighborhoods, the city points a finger …

by George Farthing on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

The building of McMansions isn't increasing density - these are just giant, single-family homes. This isn't population increase or mixed-use …

by M Elizabeth Wakeford on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

Most Recent Comments

Too often when things like this happen that are detrimental to property owners and neighborhoods, the city points a finger …

by George Farthing on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

The building of McMansions isn't increasing density - these are just giant, single-family homes. This isn't population increase or mixed-use …

by M Elizabeth Wakeford on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

I understand the Glover's predicament. In my old neighborhood off of Six Forks Road, the same intense building of McMansions …

by vocalocal on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

What part of a law doesn't this developer understand?? The way everything is permitted these days it's absolutely absurd to …

by Mollie Stokes Platt on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

"Strict compliance with the provisions of the ordinance would deprive Applicant from the reasonable use of the property," the board …

by RandyNC on In a Mid-Century Raleigh Neighborhood, New Mansions Are Built So High They Block Out the Sun (Wake County)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation