SB 3 rolls along—but with resistance | North Carolina | Indy Week
Pin It

SB 3 rolls along—but with resistance 

click to enlarge followup.jpg

After a relatively smooth ride through Senate committees, renewable energy legislation packed with perks for utilities hit turbulence last week in the House Energy and Energy Efficiency Committee. After hours of debate, SB 3 passed favorably and now moves to the Public Utilities Committee.

SB 3 contains controversial provisions for construction work in progress, known as CWIP or "baseload financing." State Rep. Susan Fisher (D-Buncombe) proposed an amendment to delete CWIP from the bill, instead establishing a study commission to analyze its financial implications. Her motion failed.

CWIP allows energy companies to ask the N.C. Utilities Commission to raise rates to pay for construction before it is complete. This makes the venture less financially risky for utilities and their shareholders, but foists construction costs on ratepayers without guarantees the plantsespecially nuclear facilitieswould be built.

State legislation severely limited CWIP in 1982, and currently it applies only to instances in which a utility's financial state is "dire." SB 3 would require only that utilities successfully argue it is "prudent."

"The questions that remain are too great," Fisher said. "I've heard from constituents that it is time to move forward with renewable energy. This portion of the bill moves us backward."

Rep. Pryor Gibson (D-Anson, Union) countered that eliminating CWIP "would destroy 18 months of work."

In 2006, renewable energy legislation, which didn't include CWIP, died in the session's final hours. CWIP opponents have argued that the provision couldn't pass as a standalone bill and has to be piggybacked on renewables legislation to succeed.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in North Carolina



Twitter Activity

Comments

Looking for a home for myself and my boys. I also have one on the way. I am in college …

by Amanda Sharek on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Have to disagree with ct. When did the N and O last provide strong city and county govt news coverage …

by Leanne Sigmon on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

Most Recent Comments

Looking for a home for myself and my boys. I also have one on the way. I am in college …

by Amanda Sharek on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Have to disagree with ct. When did the N and O last provide strong city and county govt news coverage …

by Leanne Sigmon on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

I fear the N&O wants to bet its future on being the "newspaper of record" for state government and is …

by ct on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

To clarify my comment in the article: my feelings are that the reader-focused shift is not NECESSARILY a bad move.

by andrew losowsky on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

I dropped my long-time subscription to the N&O after a columnist wrote a love letter to Art Pope because he …

by SomeCallMe...Tim on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation