Response to North Carolina's new logo | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Response to North Carolina's new logo 

Refund, please

The new North Carolina logo with the tree looks like an unsuccessful high-school art project (Triangulator, Dec. 9). The capital N and C are just plain awful. No competent typographer would distort those letters like that. And as for the tree, take a look at the Stanford University logo. Looks pretty similar to me.

Four hundred and fifty thousand dollars? Maybe the state can get its money back.

John Fitz

First draft

The [logo's] gradient is too distracting and the proportions are uneven (Triangulator, Dec. 9). When I first design a logo, I take everything the client says they'd like represented and try to fit it in there, just to get an idea of my options. This feels like that, a first draft, just something put together to get things started. Which is sad because it has the makings of a great logo.

Cori Cartwright, via Facebook

Something's missing

A gradient, three fonts, a tagline and three graphic elements (Triangulator, Dec. 9). They forgot the kitchen sink.

Sarah Herr, via Facebook

Dull, crammed, unattractive

I saw [the logo] on a billboard near Wilkesboro yesterday. It is dull-colored, too jammed together and not attractive at all (Triangulator, Dec. 9). The font is too thick and the tree in the middle is disproportionate. Had I not already seen it on the Internet last week, I doubt I would have known exactly what it was.

And I was not speeding, so I got as good a look as anyone there would have. I have no art degree, but I could have managed to get a better job done for $1.5 million [the cost of the promotional campaign].

I support promoting the state and grew up in the tourist business. This does nothing for us.

Bill Bush, via Facebook

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

I'm not arguing that things wouldn't change if Amazon's HQ2 is located in Raleigh in part due to the influx …

by SomeCallMe...Tim on Generic, Gentrified, Expensive (Letters to the Editor)

VC Rogers' recent editorial cartoon reflects a current theme for my social life. "Could we please try to go a …

by john of sparta on The History & Evolution of the Outhouse (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Bleh, Blah, and Meh (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

I'm not arguing that things wouldn't change if Amazon's HQ2 is located in Raleigh in part due to the influx …

by SomeCallMe...Tim on Generic, Gentrified, Expensive (Letters to the Editor)

VC Rogers' recent editorial cartoon reflects a current theme for my social life. "Could we please try to go a …

by john of sparta on The History & Evolution of the Outhouse (Letters to the Editor)

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation