Regional transit moves ahead--to square one | Citizen | Indy Week
Pin It

Regional transit moves ahead--to square one 

click to enlarge citizen.gif

So now, we begin again. Six months after the TTA rail project fell, was postponed, or got put in cold storage with Ted Williams' brain, the effort to plan a future for the Triangle region that includes rapid transit and sidesteps the roadway-gridlock alternative is finally at hand. Good luck to it.

That it took six months, when it should've taken two, tells a lot about the mess we're in and what it's going to take to get us past the political sprawl that, along with the stick-built kind, is at the heart of our problems. The Triangle, see, while we might look like one red-hot region to the outside world, is not one political jurisdiction but three, or six, or a dozen, depending on whether Chatham County and Johnston County count; both are booming. And even for transportation planning purposes, we are not a single "metro" area but two, with the CAMPO (Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization) to the east and the DCHC (the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO) to the west. Two at war with each other, apparently.

When the rail project hit the wall, it was quickly agreed that the two MPOs, federally charted and funded, should join with TTA to plan for a transit re-launch. Quickly agreed, that is, by everybody but the elected officials who sit on the CAMPO and DCHC boards. They proceeded to spend four months wrangling over how many Raleigh seats, Durham seats, Orange County and Paris of the Piedmont seats there oughta be on the new "transit blueprint committee."

Should it be 12 CAMPO-12 DCHC? But the CAMPO region has more people. How about 14 CAMPO-11 DCDC? Deal. Except CAMPO then appointed 17. Or was it 19? I've lost track. As of this time, there are 36 members total, as I understand it, including some who are "joint" appointees.

The result: The hoped-for launch of the blueprint committee in December will happen instead in April.

Better late than—but it's already later than you think.

Everyone has a take on what sunk the rail project. David King's is—and this is with 20-20 hindsight—that the project was too ambitious and expensive given that, when the Bush Administration came in, public transit funding was going o-u-t. "Hindsight better be more acute than foresight, or else we're not learning anything," he quips.

King retired a year ago as the long-time deputy secretary of the N.C. Department of Transportation—he was the career guy who did the railroad stuff while the pols played with their road money—and he stepped in as "interim" TTA general manager when John Claflin got the ax last fall. But don't call him interim. He'll stay if he thinks progress is possible. And last week, when we talked, he did.

Since he took the job, he says, he's been moving around, talking to local elected officials in our many, many jurisdictions, and to business folk, too. He expected to find many rejoicing at the TTA's comeuppance. No such thing. With the single exception of Wake County Commissioner Paul Coble, who told him he'd bury the TTA if he could, they all realize that the region can't grow without transit, even if they doubted the wisdom of "the TTA project."

Which was the project's other problem, in King's view. It was so ambitious, and thus took so long to push through the federal funding hoops, that it was easy for local officialdom to forget that it was their project, and the TTA their creation (or their predecessors'.)

Somehow, as the TTA put its head down and concentrated on the engineering of the thing, local politicians and the business community simply walked away, and the TTA's leadership never noticed.

OK, that's a little harsh, and I think they did notice, but didn't know what to do about our sprawl-loving, developer-dominated politics. Whatever. We begin again, with the sure knowledge that, unless we want to stop growing—and one thing you learn in business is, if you're not growing, you're dying—the Triangle's current population of 1.1 million will be 2 million in 30 years or less.

That's another 900,000 kiddies and their parents driving on I-40, I-440 and the rest, the cost of which would make the TTA rail's price tag of $800 million look like a steal, King said, if you could even add that many roads lanes "in an already built environment"—but fortunately, you can't.

Which leads back to the blueprint committee. Its job: Study all the potential transit corridors in the region and choose the one, two, three or four most promising in terms of population density, jobs and potential for a rail car, express bus or hybrid of the two. (Hybrid? They makes buses these days that run on wheels but look like trains and can operate in a rail corridor and on a city street.)

The rail corridor's still a candidate. But maybe, instead of start-up service from Raleigh-to-Durham, the cars could start in Raleigh or in Durham and, instead of frequent, daylong trains on their own set of tracks, they could run—at the start-on the freight lines' tracks, with less-frequent service and the freight lines, Norfolk Southern and CSX, paid to run them.

The main challenge for the committee, King says, is to think regionally, not parochially, and while imagining a fully developed regional transit system, come together on a plan to get it started somewhere specific and soon.

Soon? That means five years from now.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Citizen

  • John Kane's preposterous parking deck proposal

    John Kane's preposterous parking deck proposal

    Tax cuts for Raleigh's rich?
    • Aug 15, 2007
  • Transfer in the House

    Transfer in the House

    The transfer-tax option is signed into law the same week former House Speaker Jim Black goes to prison. Coincidence? No.
    • Aug 8, 2007
  • CACs languish in limbo

    CACs languish in limbo

    Hardy Watkins, longtime head of Raleigh's Community Services Department, is puzzled over why, even as Raleigh's population tripled, "civic activism has declined for some reason."
    • Jul 25, 2007
  • More »

Twitter Activity


Thanks to both of you for your stories. The legend of Kidd Brewer lives on, and so does his hill …

by Bob Geary, INDY Opinion Columnist on Mountaintopping on Kidd's Hill in Raleigh (Citizen)

Hello there...i have a funny story regarding Kidd. He and Frankie and many more football lovers were attending an after …

by bebenjohn on Mountaintopping on Kidd's Hill in Raleigh (Citizen)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

Most Recent Comments

Thanks to both of you for your stories. The legend of Kidd Brewer lives on, and so does his hill …

by Bob Geary, INDY Opinion Columnist on Mountaintopping on Kidd's Hill in Raleigh (Citizen)

Hello there...i have a funny story regarding Kidd. He and Frankie and many more football lovers were attending an after …

by bebenjohn on Mountaintopping on Kidd's Hill in Raleigh (Citizen)

Let me try commenting on this blog...again. My comment from last week has mysteriously disappeared with not explanation from Bob …

by mbrock49 on Greg Poole’s Dix is great. His TIF financing plan isn’t. (Citizen)

Mr. Geary's words fail to depict Mrs. Moye-Stallings and fall far short of the realization of her abilities. Those who …

by DWalrus on Dismissing dismissive language, welcoming disabilities advocacy (Citizen)

The city hasn't responded to "urgent needs" from parts of the city, Southeast Raleigh in particular, for decades. Instead, they've …

by ncwebguy on John Kane's preposterous parking deck proposal (Citizen)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation