Read the Constitution | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Read the Constitution 

I read "The Vanishing Voter" (cover story, Aug. 16) with considerable interest. I've been involved in electoral reform movements for 20 years, including serving for most of that time on the national executive of the Electoral Reform Coalition (ERC) in New Zealand. The ERC led the campaign to change the voting system for the Parliament of New Zealand from winner-take-all to proportional representation.

I'm writing for two reasons.

First, I'm glad to see more writers and columnists in the United States focusing on the failure of democracy in the U.S. to deliver any semblance of accountability or choice. Secondly, you appear to make the claim that the U.S. Constitution mandates winner-take-all voting for single-member districts for the House. This is a common belief, but reading the Constitution doesn't support it. No method of elections is specified for the House.

The Constitution does specify minimum numbers of representatives for some small states, but does not say how they might be elected. A form of proportional representation could be implemented with some cooperation between state and federal lawmakers, which would be entirely consistent with the Constitution.

The method of elections is defined in federal statutes linked to state laws, but these are laws and can be changed by legislatures.

Americans who wish to know more about Americans seeking electoral reform can look at www.fairvote.org, the Web site of the nonpartisan Center for Voting and Democracy.

Steve Withers
New Zealand

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

This judge sets a bad example of what law enforcement is all about. This judge is a disgrace, he is …

by one truth on Deo Vindice! Some Confederate-Friendly Readers Sound Off on Judge Fred Battaglia (Letters to the Editor)

The founding fathers made this country! The founding fathers were brilliant thinkers, revolutionaries who gave us the country that these …

by one truth on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

Most Recent Comments

This judge sets a bad example of what law enforcement is all about. This judge is a disgrace, he is …

by one truth on Deo Vindice! Some Confederate-Friendly Readers Sound Off on Judge Fred Battaglia (Letters to the Editor)

The founding fathers made this country! The founding fathers were brilliant thinkers, revolutionaries who gave us the country that these …

by one truth on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Re-dedicate the monuments to veterans and leave it at that.

by Durham451 on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Tear down all Jefferson memorials! Racist Slave owner!

by John Trololo on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Confederate Monuments?
Frankly the Dumbing Down of History is what I find deplorable here.
This blanket-condemnation of every Confederate …

by Mike PALADIN on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation