Re: MeadWestvaco responds | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: MeadWestvaco responds 

Your recent article, "Burning trees stretches the meaning of 'renewable'" (Aug. 11), contains several statements from N.C. State's Professor Hazel that we would like to address.

MeadWestvaco agrees with Professor Hazel and has stated that the use of large-scale woody biomass would drive up the price of wood fiber.

What he failed to mention is that if Senate Bill 3 is interpreted the way Duke Energy argues, then Duke Energy will be allowed to subsidize their purchase of woody biomass through their fuel cost recovery surcharge on their customers' (including MWV) power bill. This would drive up the price of our raw material and the cost of the power we purchase.

The objection is not to increased competition that would drive up the price of wood fiber—the objection is to Duke Energy having a government-approved mechanism that would allow them to pass on increased fuel costs to their customers, giving them an advantage in purchasing woody material. This does not support fair market competition.

Professor Hazel also stated that non-merchantable (unwanted) trees could not be used for renewable energy if Senate Bill 3 is interpreted restrictively. MWV's interpretation of allowed biomass includes a variety of woody waste materials and would clearly allow non-merchantable whole trees to be used to produce energy.

Finally, Professor Hazel suggests that the current economic downturn in the paper industry is responsible for unharvested wood thinnings "piling up too quickly." He might better blame that problem on the downturn in the housing market. History shows that paper companies generally purchase more thinnings in down housing markets because sawmill chips are not available. The paper industry is a reasonably reliable market for landowners' small diameter wood in good times and bad. Government policies that hurt the paper industry may well shrink that reliable market permanently.

Mark Watkins
Senior Vice President, MeadWestvaco
Richmond, Va.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

Wait, why is eating meat necessary? There are plenty of other protein sources ie: plant based protein is abundant. No …

by ammi on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Yes, everyone has to eat, but no, people don't have to eat meat. http://theconversation.com/who-lives-longe…

by Dave Connelly on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Smoked Out (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Sunday Service (Peripheral Visions)

Most Recent Comments

Wait, why is eating meat necessary? There are plenty of other protein sources ie: plant based protein is abundant. No …

by ammi on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Yes, everyone has to eat, but no, people don't have to eat meat. http://theconversation.com/who-lives-longe…

by Dave Connelly on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Ellen, I dont see your comments anywhere in my inbox. Please email them to me directly: jbillman at indyweek dot …

by Jeffrey Billman on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

I also wrote you Indyweek. Please print my comments. North Carolina is hell for hogs also …

by Ellen Canavan on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation