Re: Kenaf vs. wood | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Kenaf vs. wood 

Your recent article "Kenaf: Paper without the wood" (June 16), reprinted from EarthTalk, was misleading. There is no doubt that kenaf is an interesting plant with some useful characteristics. In the 1950s, the USDA identified kenaf as the most promising of all the non-wood plant alternatives for papermaking. Yet not a single paper mill in the U.S. uses kenaf to make paper, and only one mill in the world uses it sporadically. Why? The answer is not due to "entrenched timber companies... (...who employ many Washington lobbyists)."

Numerous universities, including N.C. State, and several commercial paper companies have studied kenaf extensively, and it simply does not compare well with pine trees economically or environmentally. Kenaf is a dicot, and only 30 percent of the plant can be used for paper. The woody xylem must be separated out, requiring additional processing, energy and cost. As an annual, kenaf production requires yearly tilling of the soil, planting the seeds, watering and fertilizer, and often herbicides and pesticides. Grown as a monoculture, kenaf is susceptible to root knot nematode infestation. Since paper mills have to produce year-round and kenaf is harvested only once a year, huge quantities must be grown, baled and stored to provide fiber for the mill, requiring storage facilities and more energy and costs.

Trees for pulp and paper are grown on plantations, freeing native forests from harvesting for these products. Trees can be harvested year-round. Much of the carbon captured by trees stays in their roots, which return carbon and other nutrients to the soil. A pine plantation sequesters carbon, produces oxygen, holds water, and can provide wildlife habitat and even recreation for people.

Thus it is the economic and environmental challenges of kenaf that make it unsuitable for papermaking, challenges that were downplayed in your article.

Dr. Robert D. Brown, Dean
NCSU College of Natural Resources, Raleigh

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. The Dark Side of the Funny Business (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation