Re: "Creation Nation" | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: "Creation Nation" 

Two kinds of people read your Feb. 22 article "Creation Nation": those who believe in creationism, eager to further support their beliefs, and those opposed to it, looking to reinforce their beliefs by finding flaws in the article.

A portion of Jason Lisle's quote struck me as profound. He said that man "makes mistakes, has limited knowledge, can often misinterpret the evidence, is sometimes dishonest." His quote was supporting creationism, but my point is, he is also a man. Could he be making a mistake and misinterpreting evidence?

As adults, we prematurely "decide" what we believe. We adopt beliefs from our upbringing, alter them a bit so they feel like our own, then spend the rest of our lives collecting two mounds of data: one that reinforces what we believe and one that discredits opposing views.

When we "know" what we believe, we are not interested in the validity of the other side. We won't admit that the other side may know something that we don't. We dig our heels in and defend our truth, instead of critically shining the opposing light onto our own beliefs.

What is so frightening about examining the other viewpoint; one just as heavy with evidence, disproof and agenda as our own? Would it take too much energy to sift through the loaded data and skewed "facts"? Would it be so traumatic to learn we had been "wrong"?

Ken Ham feels that understanding creationism is the key to ending racism. I have a better idea. What if we started learning about beliefs opposing our own? Not with a critical eye, looking to discredit and find holes, but with an acceptance that "truths" we've held for years may not hold up in the light of the opposing view.

Susan Hurley

Durham

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. The Crown of Civilization (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation