Re: Chapel Hill police raid; Southeast Raleigh | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Re: Chapel Hill police raid; Southeast Raleigh 


Re: Police raid

The occupation of the Chrysler Building on Sunday was not undertaken entirely by anarchists, as you incorrectly reported in your Nov. 16 article "Chapel Hill: cops vs. anarchists and nobody wins." Those detained or arrested included reporters with press credentials, legal observers, random passersby and people of various political philosophies who believe that a different Franklin Street is possible. However, the absurd and lethally dangerous level of force used to terrorize and evict the peaceful occupation of the unlocked building was justified by the police on the grounds that "known anarchists" were participating and that certain "literature" had been found there. Are we willing to accept that a group's literature and political beliefs can be used explicitly by the state to justify threatening their lives? Should the totally unarmed participants in a creative, festive act of civil disobedience have loaded assault rifles shoved in their faces because of what they allegedly think or read?

The issue is not "cops versus anarchists." The issue is a mayor who values profit over people and a police force that bases repression on political beliefs, versus a diverse group of visionaries who dreamed of a free community center instead of a rotting, absentee-owned waste of a building. This supposedly "deliberate and appropriate" police response has prompted outrage throughout Chapel Hill and attracted embarrassing national media coverage. "No good guys"? Perhaps not, but there are undoubtedly some who support using paramilitary police to defend the interests of the wealthy against social movements, versus many more who value human need over private greed. Which side are you on?

Alex Berkman
Chapel Hill


Re: Southeast Raleigh

I find it truly amazing that Bob Geary can write such a long article on the problems in Southeast Raleigh without once mentioning the problems ("The other side of town," Nov. 16). Oh, he covers the symptoms very well, but the problems he completely ignores. And without dealing with the problems, there are no viable solutions.

In a nutshell, those problems are:

1. Black youth not taking full advantage of the free education offered them.

2. Black teenage girls getting pregnant at rates that are simply astounding.

3. Black teenage boys getting black teenage girls pregnant, then walking away from any responsibility.

4. The pervasive culture of drug use in all its forms.

5. The unwillingness of black residents to properly inform police of those who they know for certain are criminals, especially those who are violent or members of organized gangs.

6. The seeming indifference of residents, especially poor renters, to keep their neighborhoods clean and uncluttered.

7. Finally, too much corruption in too many churches for far too long.

The solutions to those problems are plainly obvious and do not require massive and expensive studies to derive or government programs to solve. The solutions, though, reside within each individual to do what they know is right. If they do that, everything else will fall in line. If they don't, well, the cesspool of crime and poverty will continue.

Steve Crisp
Raleigh


Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

Who are these people who behave so badly and dare anyone to comment on them in public? Are they relatively …

by MickeyNotMouse on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation