Questions of Accountability Loom Over the Wake County Register of Deeds Scandal | Wake County | Indy Week
Pin It

Questions of Accountability Loom Over the Wake County Register of Deeds Scandal 

Wake County plans to submit an initial insurance claim next week for the loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars from its Register of Deeds office during at least three years.

The handling of that claim—and other parts of an ongoing investigation—will rest in part on one question: Are people who work at the popularly elected Register of Deeds office considered county employees? More questions underlie that one: Who had ultimate responsibility for the office? The Register of Deeds at the time, Laura Riddick, or the county manager and the Board of Commissioners?

The answers may determine which parts of county government the insurance company—and the legal system—could find responsible.

Known as a "proof of loss" statement, the claim will tell an insurance company, in this case Travelers, what happened, what kind of loss was sustained, and how much money is missing. A Wake County investigation found that the register's office used sloppy accounting practices and other loose procedures that resulted in losses that could total millions over a period as long as a decade.

Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman has said she expects the investigation to conclude in September. The insurance claim is the first step in the county's civil effort to regain its lost funds.

"We'll have to see whether they accept it or ask for more information," county attorney Scott Warren says of Travelers. "They've been very cooperative."

The question of whether people who work for elected officials such as Sheriff Donnie Harrison or Riddick are county employees would seem to be straightforward, since they're on the county's payroll. But things aren't actually that clear-cut, Warren says.

"We budget them; we pay for them," he says. "It's kind of a muddled area. It's not well settled."

Last year, the state Supreme Court upheld an appeals court decision in a case called McLaughlin v. Bailey, ruling that "employees of a county sheriff, including deputies ... are directly employed by the sheriff and not by the county or a county department."

The status of Register of Deeds employees is not as clear, but the county could claim that any register employees found at fault were not under the its direct control, which could bolster its insurance claim.

Asked about his employees' status, Sheriff Donnie Harrison cites case and state law, but he adds that he has sometimes asked the county to audit his office.

"Some people's take on it is the sheriff has to ask them to come in and do it," Harrison says. "I don't care either way. It's county money and I like to have a good relationship with them."

In the end, this insurance claim may rest on one more seemingly simple question: Who was at fault?

County officials have been working on a memorandum of understanding with the Register of Deeds office about the relationship between the two entities. An early draft of an August 5 memo included this clause: "Whereas, the County's financial policies and procedures apply only to employees of Wake County government, its agencies, and departments and not to the offices of elected County officials and their staffs."

The day after the INDY asked about the intent of the passage, it was dropped from the memo, which is a work in progress.

In another development shaping the ongoing query, county manager Jim Hartmann announced last week that he is stepping down as of October 27. Hartmann says his departure has nothing to do with the Register of Deeds investigation.

Hartmann's departure date means that he will be at his post next month when the SBI reports on its inquiry into millions of transactions at the Register of Deeds office since 2008. However, it seems likely that legal wrangling over the loss of public funds will continue long after Hartmann has gone.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Wake County



Twitter Activity

Comments

Never thought I would see "progressives" against preserving land. Doesn't matter, though. I'm going to vote for it.

by JohnNC on How Wake Commissioners Tore Themselves Apart Over a Defunct Golf Course (Wake County)

Most Recent Comments

Never thought I would see "progressives" against preserving land. Doesn't matter, though. I'm going to vote for it.

by JohnNC on How Wake Commissioners Tore Themselves Apart Over a Defunct Golf Course (Wake County)

This is what is wrong when the Indy doesn't do it's homework and reports on city issues. There was and …

by Meredith de la Vergne on How Wake Commissioners Tore Themselves Apart Over a Defunct Golf Course (Wake County)

A + writing Indy

by Black Raleigh on How Wake Commissioners Tore Themselves Apart Over a Defunct Golf Course (Wake County)

Libertarianism is a faith-based system. Not based on math or history. Hopefully one day a reporter will ask them to …

by Frank Hyman on In Wake County, the Libertarians Are Coming—and They’re Not Just Old Whites Dudes Looking to Skip Out on Taxes (Wake County)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation