Perry K. Woods | Indy Week

Perry K. Woods 
Member since Jun 11, 2013

Recent Comments

Re: “Raleigh Mayoral Candidate Charles Francis Calls Mayor McFarlane 'Aloof, Disengaged'

Dear FON Citizen. You are inaccurate. Although CETF recommendations do include what you outlined, the May 2nd vote did not 'adopt' those recommendations. Admittedly, the debate was confusing, but I would refer you to the minutes of the meeting. The motion passed was not to implement all the CETF recommendations. They voted to create the recommended board at a future work session, that represents the diversity of our city. to lead a process facilitated by experts, to gather input from everyone, including CAC's on what practices/recommendations work or not.

The goal all along has been to develop an enhanced Citizen Engagement process. I was making no claim about the CETF recommendations, but was referring to the process The City Manager outlined at last Council meeting. That process will start at work session on Aug. 28th with experts from NCSU, and it is expected this process will take up to two years. CAC's are absolutely to be included in that process.

There will be ample opportunity for you, CAC's, and any who are concerned to be heard on this issue.

Thank you for your passion and love for our City.


2 likes, 16 dislikes
Posted by Perry K. Woods on 07/10/2017 at 10:18 AM

Re: “Raleigh bars tell the city where it can shove its sidewalk permits

1.) It was this Council, though the ‘Livable Streets’ initiative that made the investments that have revitalized Downtown Raleigh. Important to remember the goal is a ‘livable street,’
2.) It’s not just about noise. The City wants vitality, but also has a responsibility to ensure public safety, and what has been happening has been becoming a public safety issue. Establishments have taken liberties, like blocking the entire sidewalk, forcing patrons in the street, along with kiddie pools and slip and slides on the sidewalks.
3.) Original staff proposal was based on what Austin, TX does, where only restaurants, not bars, are allowed sidewalk alcohol sales. The same is true in Charlotte. There are also questions of whether staff had the legal authority to issue the Public Use Permits to these establishments originally.
4.) Council listened and did not ban bars from outdoor sidewalk sales. The compromise requires seating and increased enforcement, along with the reduction of hours to midnight on weeknights, and 1:00 am on weekends. The hours are the same as New York, and later than even Savannah, GA. They are longer than the overwhelming majority of cities in America according to data acquired by staff.
5.) The only difference in what passed, and what would have passed unanimously is 2 hours a week on weekends from 1:00 am to 2:00. If that is onerous, Council can change when they revisit in 3 months, although bars in most every other city seem to be able to make those hours work.
6.) Currently, establishments only pay $150/year for a Public Use Permit for the right to utilize these sidewalks . If sidewalk alcohol sales, and keeping them going until 2:00 am is so critical to their business model, then perhaps they should pay rent, something equivalent to ¼ of downtown rental prices, to cover the cost of more enforcement, and then give them the extra hour. Average rent downtown is in the $35 to $40/sq ft range. 1/4 would be around $8 to $10/sq ft.

8 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Perry K. Woods on 08/13/2015 at 10:13 AM

Re: “5 Takeaways from Raleigh’s Outdoor Drinking Debate

Well thought out post. Council is working right now on updating a 10 year downtown vision to attempt to address all those issues.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Perry K. Woods on 07/30/2015 at 2:55 PM

Re: “The No Hand King waits for his chance to pop a wheelie to California

Kickstarter link?

Posted by Perry K. Woods on 05/02/2015 at 9:16 AM

Re: “In Wake Dems' DA primary, Boz Zellinger displays weakness


Thanks for your thoughtful post. It was well reasoned.

Boz is an intelligent, friendly, and honest young man. However, ambition may have gotten the best of him here because he owns this situation. He sought SEANC's endorsement in writing, was okay with them violating their own rules, to make the endorsement, and has their top IE political operative as his chief strategist. He was aware of Lorrin speaking out against SEANC's Pay Day purchasing program that is a predatory lending scheme when he sought the endorsement. Last year SEANC made $280K off this program. Essentially, they are spending money made off the desperation of their members to fund this effort in support of Boz, and it is not really believable he didn't know they were going to spend money on his behalf.

He has had over a week to disavow it, but instead has denied responsibility, then last night, after apologizing to a reporter, basically defended and repeated the attack in an e-mail.

This is not a legislative race, but the DA. You are absolutely correct when you wrote, 'The Office of the District Attorney should be independent of special interest groups. The office should not be for sale.' When it comes to the public trust, perception matters. Unfortunately, in perhaps a bit of immaturity, he has allowed himself to be too closely connected with SEANC, undermining his ability to fill this role.

Full disclosure, I work for Lorrin. I like Boz, but here he has made a mistake.

5 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Perry K. Woods on 04/25/2014 at 2:10 PM

Re: “More on Randy Voller: Raleigh's Nina Szlosberg-Landis, 1st vice chair, resigns in protest

Mr. Franklin, As a new sustaining fund co-chair, how much money did you raise in the last month?

Was it more than Ms. Szlosberg-Landis? Which old pols are you referring to. I recall winning an election out your way once. We lost that seat after I had moved on. Was it your fault then?

Not sure why you continue to defend Mr. Parker. He either covered up sexual harassment or exhibited the worst political judgment in the history of the Party. He compounded that by placing himself above the good of the Party, then lying to everyone from our Gubernatorial nominee, to SEC members to the DNC by orchestrating that farce of a meeting. No one attacked Mr. Parker before or during that meeting because we made the mistake of believing him, and for good of the party, let him try to save face. Instead what we got was orchestrated false attacks from people like you and Mr. Telesca on our elected officials, as well as on Sallie Leslie who did nothing but serve the Party honorably for 18 years.

You can attack Nina, but she has done far more to elect democrats than you, Mr. Voller, and the rest of your 'cabal' have combined. She won overwhelmingly in January against the incumbent, (whom Mr. Voller put back on Executive Council despite her overwhelming defeat) while Mr. Voller won by just 11 votes against a man who said he did not want the job and was not there. Instead of realizing he won a narrow election and that being Party Chair does not make you important, just gives you a chance to make Party important, Mr. Voller and his supporters have continued to attack and bully to try and consolidate power (that does not exist), rather than reaching out and actually unifying the Party.

I would suggest that instead of attacking anyone who raises questions, you guys take Nina's resignation as a wake up call, because quickly you not going to be able to even pay for Mr. Voller's legal expenses, much less keep the doors of the Goodwin House open.

11 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Perry K. Woods on 06/11/2013 at 10:00 AM

Extra Extra!

Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.

  • Weekly Newsletter (Wednesday) - The stories in this week's issue
  • Weekly Events Newsletter - Our picks for your weekend and beyond

Login to choose
your subscriptions!

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation