Orange still wrangling trash plans | Orange County | Indy Week
Pin It

Orange still wrangling trash plans 

⇒ Background: "Where should Orange County stick its garbage?" (cover story, March 11, 2009)

click to enlarge followup.jpg

Building and operating a waste transfer station would cost Orange County taxpayers roughly $55 million over 20 years—less than the cost of paying private companies to haul trash over the same time period, according to a draft report issued by the county's consultant last week.

County leaders had requested the report as part of their final-hour survey of alternative options for waste disposal, including the temporary use of private waste haulers. Charlotte-based firm Olver was paid $254,000 to implement a 16-month long site-selection process that has narrowed the county's choices for a transfer station down to two sites along N.C. 54 in southwestern Orange County.

"The issue for us is not whether 54 is a good site or not," Olver representative James Reynolds told the Orange County Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) at a March 31 meeting. "The county has gone through an elaborate process that got you there. You don't want to just abandon that totally."

As a designer and planner of solid waste facilities, including a proposed transfer station on Eubanks Road that commissioners abandoned in favor of the site-selection process, Olver could eventually earn a design contract for the project it's recommending—and could lose out if Orange County gives up on a transfer station entirely.

In presenting the argument for building a transfer station, the consultants showed a 20-year graph comparing the annual costs of operating a site along N.C. 54 with several private-hauler options—raising doubt from one official who was there.

"I'm not sure that graph answers my question," said Commissioner Steve Yuhasz.

Capital costs are spread out over 20 years, making it impossible to compare the contractual risks of hiring a private contractor with the long-term costs of investing in a county-run facility. Olver projects that those costs—including land acquisition, development and construction—will total less than $5 million, a figure substantially lower than had previously been estimated.

Olver achieved that figure, in part, by recommending the county purchase just 25 acres, for a total of $375,000. However, that estimate is at odds with the proposed sites' property owners: one is demanding $3 million for a 143-acre property, and the other refuses to sell.

Furthermore, Olver now recommends a scaled-down version of the transfer station it originally proposed. The station would now contain one bay, instead of two, and would not contain an on-site recycling center—the rationale for favoring larger sites, such as the 143-acre property, in the site-selection process.

Other numbers raised eyebrows, including the distance Olver calculated from the N.C. 54 sites to Chapel Hill (8 miles), shorter than the projected distance to Carrboro (8.7 miles). In fact, the proposed sites are roughly 8 miles west of Carrboro and 11 miles west of Chapel Hill.

A response from the SWAB is forthcoming, and the final report will be delivered to commissioners in advance of an April 21 meeting.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Orange County



Twitter Activity

Comments

Thankfully our community is also home to the very talented and funny women of the Eyes Up Here comedy troupe. …

by Kristin Lione on The Misogyny Behind the Unraveling of DSI Comedy (Orange County)

Chris, this sort of disingenuousness is tiresome. Of course they are not the same. However, symbols and language work tightly …

by raro on Orange County Schools May Finally Ban the Confederate Flag from School Property (Orange County)

Most Recent Comments

Thankfully our community is also home to the very talented and funny women of the Eyes Up Here comedy troupe. …

by Kristin Lione on The Misogyny Behind the Unraveling of DSI Comedy (Orange County)

Chris, this sort of disingenuousness is tiresome. Of course they are not the same. However, symbols and language work tightly …

by raro on Orange County Schools May Finally Ban the Confederate Flag from School Property (Orange County)

I have no idea why progressives equate symbols or language with violence...
They are not the same. …

by Chris Weaver on Orange County Schools May Finally Ban the Confederate Flag from School Property (Orange County)

I am reading the above comments and am floored. I am a parent of a Freshman at CHHS currently and …

by ActNow on Teachers give a failing grade to working conditions (Orange County)

Orange County Board of Adjustment - 3
Party Barn (aka Barn of Chapel Hill) - 0
I guess I should …

by Ron Royster on Orange County Board of Adjustment: No Parties at the Party Barn (Orange County)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation