Neil Riemann | Indy Week

Neil Riemann 
Member since Sep 3, 2015



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Parting Shots: A Column Ends, But the Struggle Continues

Strong finish. Congrats on the long run!

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Neil Riemann on 02/24/2016 at 1:08 PM

Re: “Assault with a deadly beanbag (and other crimes in downtown Raleigh)

Here are some "quibbles with your framing."

You say Medford et al. were charged with destruction of city property for unbolting a bench and moving it ten feet. Actually, they also filed down the mount, which seems likely to require a repair. Did they fix it? And even if they did, there is a reason they are bolted down. Most adults understand that.

You have a lot of complaints of irrationality from the London Bridge Pub, but from the public record, it appears that nothing was actually done to it.

You have a bunch of people alleging huge financial losses in a world where people also allege climate change is not real. It would be nice to see their books. Did they show them to you? A smidgen of doubt might be in order in real journalism.

You have the folks from the Pour House complaining about a "weeks long" battle over placement of their cash register. I get that they don't like what the police think the law is, but according to your article, they were given plenty of chances (weeks of them) before being threatened with a charge for ignoring police instructions. If they take the charge, they'll have the chance to go to court to see who is right. Or they can go to the Council and ask for a change in whatever rule applies. There's a lot of complaining about how Millennials are ignored there, but perhaps they were heard there (consider the issue of food trucks) and simply didn't prevail on this issue.

In framing elsewhere, you also have people pretending public property is private property, and claiming that the free market should rule and these bars should be allowed to do as they please. But it's not #SaveThePatios, it's #LetMeHaveThePublicSidewalk (there's that framing again). And it's not a "free market" when somebody expropriates public property for the benefit of their private enterprise. In a real free market government, the public infrastructure owner would charge businesses a market-based user fee. And it would be a hell of a lot, if the use of it is as valuable as these guys claim.

Nor is this regulation proof that our regulators are from Mayberry; it would seem that most cities larger than ours have similar, or more burdensome, regulations.

It's completely clear that the new rules are hurting some businesses, and I certainly don't blame them for complaining. Perhaps they will come up with the books and show these losses. It's also conceivable to me that the Council, in balancing the interest of businesses, patrons, and residents in this location, got it wrong. Maybe there were too few complainants. Or maybe, as Councilor Gaylord suggested, having people spill out of bars twice won't really address the noise problem, particularly since private patios aren't regulated. These are localized problems, and the solution for the center of downtown may not be the same as the solution for Hillsborough Street, Five Points, or OTB, and the regulations don't seem to consider that either.

But most of the arguments advanced against these limitations are of really poor quality, and this kind of coverage does not exactly advance the ball.

13 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Neil Riemann on 09/03/2015 at 10:55 PM

Extra Extra!

Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.

  • Weekly Newsletter (Wednesday) - The stories in this week's issue
  • Weekly Events Newsletter - Our picks for your weekend and beyond

Login to choose
your subscriptions!

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation