N.C. Senate passes Racial Justice Act | North Carolina | Indy Week
Pin It

N.C. Senate passes Racial Justice Act 

By a 36-10 vote, the N.C. Senate has passed the Racial Justice Act (SB 461). The landmark bill would prevent the execution of defendants who can prove race was was an underlying factor in the decision to seek, or impose, the death penalty at the time of their trial. (For background on the bill, see "De facto death penalty moratorium may end," May 13, 2009.) The bill will now move to the House, which is considering a similar version today.

"Let's not be naïve. [Race] has been a factor, at times, in the past, and we need to recognize that," Sen. Floyd McKissick Jr. (D-Durham), the Senate bill sponsor, said on the Senate floor. "I'd much rather see a person end up in life in prison, without parole, because it may be fair and appropriate for the offense he committed."

The vote came shortly after the Senate rejected an amendment, by Senate Minority Leader Phil Berger (R-Guilford), that would have prevented death-row inmates, who had previously argued for racial discrimination in their trials, from "relying on the statistical advantages that this bill would allow you to have.”

“Review after review, appellate courts determined that race was not a factor in particular cases," Berger said.

However, that was the point of the bill—as de jure racism in the courtroom has been difficult to prove. Under the Racial Justice Act, defendants would be allowed to present evidence that race was an underlying factor in decisions to seek, or impose, the death penalty in the county, prosecutorial district or judicial division where they were tried. (This language differs from the House version, which would also consider statewide statistics; an earlier version of the Senate bill would have included contiguous prosecutorial districts.) If defendants can prove race was a factor, their sentences would be reduced to life in prison without parole.

"We're not allowed to present a pattern of prosecution based on race, in the courtroom," Mark Kleinschmidt, executive director of Fair Trial Initiative, said in an interview. "If you have a prosecutor selecting people for the death penalty, based on race, they're shielded, unless there is direct evidence."

He added: "You're allowed to talk about [de facto racism] with access to housing. You don't have to have direct evidence that a landlord is using the n-word to deny you a place to live. You can show a pattern and practice of discrimination."

The bill passes with an earlier amendment, also by Sen. Berger, that would exempt the Council of State from approving the execution protocol—which is currently holding up executions in the state, due to an Office of Administrative Hearings ruling that the Council of State's approval violated state administrative code. The amendment would also prevent doctors from being punished for participating in executions, an issue that landed in the N.C. Supreme Court but was resolved by a 4-3 vote, allowing the doctors to participate without punishment. (Again, see "De facto death penalty moratorium may end".)

The House version of the bill is also on the House calendar today. Check back for updates to see who voted for, and against, the Senate bill.

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in North Carolina



Twitter Activity

Comments

Ok. FIRST of all: NOBODY MAKES ANYONE come into these places!!!! I work in one and everyday people are complaining …

by workflow on Sweepstakes cafes: coming to your low-income neighborhood (North Carolina)

Id like to purchase one of these "doublewide" , if affordable, lost my place due to unreliable roommate, I'm trying …

by Roynell Tres Richardson on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Most Recent Comments

Ok. FIRST of all: NOBODY MAKES ANYONE come into these places!!!! I work in one and everyday people are complaining …

by workflow on Sweepstakes cafes: coming to your low-income neighborhood (North Carolina)

Id like to purchase one of these "doublewide" , if affordable, lost my place due to unreliable roommate, I'm trying …

by Roynell Tres Richardson on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Looking for a home for myself and my boys. I also have one on the way. I am in college …

by Amanda Sharek on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Have to disagree with ct. When did the N and O last provide strong city and county govt news coverage …

by Leanne Sigmon on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

I fear the N&O wants to bet its future on being the "newspaper of record" for state government and is …

by ct on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation