N.C. House spares muni broadband | North Carolina | Indy Week
Pin It

N.C. House spares muni broadband 

They were exhausted, but this past Saturday at 4:55 a.m., a majority of the N.C. House of Representatives intrepidly stood up to big telecom companies in a critical battle over Internet access for the state's small towns and rural counties.

That's when the House rejected a Senate-passed moratorium on municipal broadband systems, a major victory for advocates of Internet access. "This is an enormous win for the every-day North Carolinian who remains significantly underserved by our state's largest broadband providers," said municipal broadband consultant Catharine Rice of Action Audits.

Citizens of Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill can easily obtain high-speed Internet access, but thousands of residents as close to the center of the Triangle as Chatham and Caswell counties still must rely on slow, unreliable dial-up service. Sen. David Hoyle's (D-Gaston) broadband bill, S-1209, would have kept it that way.

Hoyle, a recipient of large campaign contributions from the big telecom companies and their lobbyists, led overwhelming passage in the Senate of this bill that would have imposed a 14-month moratorium on municipal broadband projects while a commission studied the matter.

Telecom giants Time Warner Cable, AT&T and Embarq lobbied for the bill's passage. The N.C. League of Municipalities led the efforts to fight the moratorium provision, claiming that the telecom companies have failed to serve rural communities because they cannot make a profit there. Five North Carolina towns already have their own municipal networks, and counties like Caswell and Chatham want their own, too.

The drama in the House began in early June when Ways and Means Chair Bill Faison (D-Orange, Caswell) sought to stall S-1209. Hoyle struck back by hijacking an unrelated bill in the Senate and tacking on his anti-municipal provisions. Hoyle's tactics prompted House Speaker Joe Hackney (D-Orange, Chatham, Moore) to send the amended bill to the Rules Committee where, Hackney said, "I send bills to park them."

Then the House killed Sen. Hoyle's bill when it voted to permit a study of municipal broadband service without forcing a moratorium on towns and counties.

Kelli Kukura, director of government affairs at the North Carolina League of Municipalities, says "it is important to recognize" the significance of the amendment since it permits but does not mandate the broadband study.

Senate proponents of the municipal broadband moratorium tried one more late-night maneuver as Sen. Dan Clodfelter (D-Mecklenburg) rebuilt a gutted kidney awareness bill to revive Hoyle's original anti-municipal provisions. This last ditch effort was not appreciated by the House, which voted it down, 91-6.

Kukura applauded the House's impressive show of solidarity in the wee hours of July 10. "Any legislation that allows our cities and towns to continue planning and serving their citizens, local businesses and future employers who need broadband is great legislation," she said.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in North Carolina



Twitter Activity

Comments

Looking for a home for myself and my boys. I also have one on the way. I am in college …

by Amanda Sharek on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Have to disagree with ct. When did the N and O last provide strong city and county govt news coverage …

by Leanne Sigmon on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

Most Recent Comments

Looking for a home for myself and my boys. I also have one on the way. I am in college …

by Amanda Sharek on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Have to disagree with ct. When did the N and O last provide strong city and county govt news coverage …

by Leanne Sigmon on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

I fear the N&O wants to bet its future on being the "newspaper of record" for state government and is …

by ct on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

To clarify my comment in the article: my feelings are that the reader-focused shift is not NECESSARILY a bad move.

by andrew losowsky on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

I dropped my long-time subscription to the N&O after a columnist wrote a love letter to Art Pope because he …

by SomeCallMe...Tim on The N&O Promises Less Spinach. What Does That Mean for Local News Consumers? (North Carolina)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation