Meet N.C. Republicans’ Latest Plan to Lock In Trickle Down | Triangulator | Indy Week
Pin It

Meet N.C. Republicans’ Latest Plan to Lock In Trickle Down 

Since the Reagan revolution, the organizing principle of Republican governance has boiled down to "lower taxes, better economy." After Republicans took control of North Carolina in 2010, they hewed closely to this philosophy, flattening and (especially for those at the top) reducing the state's income tax rate.

Now, with Governor McCrory locked in a pitched reelection battle and the GOP's supermajority in the state House in question (thanks, Donald Trump!), Republicans are seeking to enshrine supply-side ideology into the state's constitution once and for all. Last week, the Senate proposed a constitutional amendment that would cap the state's income tax rate at 5.5 percent. If it clears the legislature—putting the amendment on the November ballot requires a three-fifths majority in both the House and Senate—and if voters approve it in November, the state will have to look for other revenue sources or cut public services whenever it needs money.

Which, eventually, it will. When that happens, critics say, the poor and working class will pay the price.

click to enlarge screen_shot_2016-06-22_at_6.14.23_am.png

That's because the most obvious new revenue stream would be a sales tax increase or expansion, which hits lower-income families the hardest, as they spend a larger portion of their incomes on items and services than do wealthier people. Thus, a greater percentage of their incomes will go to sales taxes than rich people's will. This is already happening: a 2015 Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy report found that the state's bottom 60 percent of earners pay nearly twice as much of their incomes in taxes as the state's top 1 percent. The amendment would only exacerbate that divide.

Not surprisingly, this plan has seen fierce opposition from Democrats, including Treasurer Janet Cowell. In a letter to the Senate Finance Committee, Cowell said the cap could negatively impact the state's AAA bond rating and lesson "the reliability of the state's revenue stream." (N.C. Policy Watch reported that the committee denied Cowell the chance to speak before it passed the bill.)

The idea isn't new. In 1992, Colorado voters passed an amendment known as the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, or TABOR, that required voter approval on all future tax increases. But after the post-9/11 recession, public services were so squeezed that, in 2005, Colorado voters suspended TABOR. (It went back into effect in 2010.)

Senator Jay Chaudhuri, D-Raleigh, who used to be Cowell's general counsel, calls the Senate's plan "TABOR-lite."

"First, you never want to restrict our ability to raise revenue," Chaudhuri says. "And secondly, a tax cap is a very short-term solution in trying to understand how we avoid volatility with state budget deficits."

For an example of how this can go south, look no further than Louisiana. After former governor Bobby Jindal lowered taxes, declining oil prices led to a $3 billion budget shortfall, threatening to bankrupt the whole state. Kansas went down a similar road, slashing taxes on the wealthy and waiting on the trickle-down gods to deliver a roaring economy. Instead, earlier this year, the state faced a $228 million deficit.

North Carolina's Senate will vote on the amendment June 25.

triangulator@indyweek.com

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Triangulator



Twitter Activity

Comments

Maybe ex Commissioner Wheeler could explain why he was against net-neutrality until President Obama told him at the last minute …

by MJKopechne on This Week Could Mark the End of the Web as We Know It (Triangulator)

The comparison to the 2009 Wake County Commissioners vote could hardly be more off base, to the point of calling …

by George Farthing on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Most Recent Comments

Maybe ex Commissioner Wheeler could explain why he was against net-neutrality until President Obama told him at the last minute …

by MJKopechne on This Week Could Mark the End of the Web as We Know It (Triangulator)

The comparison to the 2009 Wake County Commissioners vote could hardly be more off base, to the point of calling …

by George Farthing on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

okay, I need help understanding this. So, the mayor makes appointment to certain committees each term and the rest of …

by Black Raleigh on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

I really don't understand the purpose of this article except to cause dissent. Assumptions and interpretations were made that were …

by Terry Snyder on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Two points stand out immediately upon reading this account.

If you are going to insist on continuing to use …

by FONCitizen on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation