Letters to the Editor | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Letters to the Editor 

Look harder

I have been waiting five years for the Independent to start asking some hard questions about 9/11. The articles by Godfrey Cheshire and Bob Geary barely touched the big questions about the infamous day itself, but at least talked about the alliance of self-interest between Bush and bin Laden, and the insanity of the Bush response.

Bush's behavior is that of a poker player who insists that he has won the hand, but refuses to show his cards. Suspects were hidden away in gulags; WTC evidence was whisked away to the recyclers; investigations were stonewalled as long as possible, starved for funds when finally started; Bush testimony was not under oath, but still in the presence of Dick Cheney, presumably to help them keep their stories straight. The FBI confiscated all of the videos of the Pentagon strike, and does not even list Osama as wanted for the 9/11 attacks. Suspicious behavior worthy of additional questioning. I note that the Indy editors felt the need to add a "no explosives" disclaimer to Peter Eichenberger's excellent article ("In the U.S., business comes before patriotism," Sept. 6), when nothing was said about explosives. The cited National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) fact sheet can say that there was no evidence for explosives, because NIST did not actually do any tests for them. Go here for a good analysis of the NIST Q&A: 911research.wtc7.net/reviews/nist/WTC_FAQ_reply.html.

The Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves theory has almost no supporting evidence, other than Osama's John Mark Kerr-like confessions, timed to provide maximum aid to the GOP in our elections. It does not explain where the jets were on 9/11. It is seriously lacking in scientific validity, as explanations it provides for the tower collapses are in open contradiction to the laws of physics.

For an independent media outlet like yours, this topic is a gold mine with Pulitzer potential, worthy of more questions--not disclaimers.

Christopher Lizak
Raleigh

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

Wait, why is eating meat necessary? There are plenty of other protein sources ie: plant based protein is abundant. No …

by ammi on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Yes, everyone has to eat, but no, people don't have to eat meat. http://theconversation.com/who-lives-longe…

by Dave Connelly on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Smoked Out (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Sunday Service (Peripheral Visions)

Most Recent Comments

Wait, why is eating meat necessary? There are plenty of other protein sources ie: plant based protein is abundant. No …

by ammi on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Yes, everyone has to eat, but no, people don't have to eat meat. http://theconversation.com/who-lives-longe…

by Dave Connelly on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Ellen, I dont see your comments anywhere in my inbox. Please email them to me directly: jbillman at indyweek dot …

by Jeffrey Billman on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

I also wrote you Indyweek. Please print my comments. North Carolina is hell for hogs also …

by Ellen Canavan on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation