Letters to the Editor: Divorce laws penalize women; Durham: Focus less on cars | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Letters to the Editor: Divorce laws penalize women; Durham: Focus less on cars 

Divorce laws penalize women

As your "10 Smart Bills" article noted, there have been quite a few bills introduced this past session that would have created beneficial policy solutions to some of the problems currently facing many North Carolinians. Many of the bills listed in the article would have a positive impact on women and families in NC, increasing opportunities for greater economic self-sufficiency and better access to quality health care. We would also include HB867 on that list, which would have eliminated for domestic violence victims NC's already questionable requirement that couples be separated for one year prior to obtaining a divorce. Requiring abuse victims to stay legally tied to their abusers for an arbitrary period of time is not the way to support victims, and exposes them to further abuse, This bill seems like it should have had an easy and bipartisan pass through our legislature, yet it went nowhere.

We're again hearing talk this session from our legislators about women's rights and safety, and the protection of families. Much of this talk is coming from lawmakers who ram through bills to restrict abortion access, prevent families from accessing health care, and restrict our marriage choices; while a number of truly beneficial bills have been left to die in committee. Who are these legislators really protecting? Not the majority of North Carolinians.

Tara Romano, President, NC Women United


Durham: Focus less on cars

Hats off to the organizers of the recent Jane's Walk in downtown Durham ("Don't let it be Anywhere, U.S.A.", May 13). It is fitting to honor Jane Jacobs, who as a private citizen did so much to further the health and walkability of cities. And Curt Eshelman and Allen Wilcox (and many others) deserve our unending praise for creating Durham Central Park.

If Jacobs were alive today and visited Durham, what would she tell us? As the article mentions, she would talk about sidewalks and human scale and mixed use. But I think she would go much further and push us to seriously undo the damage of auto-focused planning. These are hard fixes that will take public sector leadership, not just responsible real estate development.

For example, how about returning all four of Durham's major one ways (Roxboro, Mangum, Duke, Gregson) and the Loop to two-way streets? That could transform block after block of the city. How about simply tearing out the Durham Freeway for a mile or two either side of downtown? Other major cities are doing just that, by creating beautiful boulevards and linear parks. Such ambitious projects undoubtedly will be tackled by future generations of forward-thinking Durhamites—and Jane Jacobs will be smiling.

Fred Broadwell, Durham

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. No Candy Before Dinner (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Money Tree (Peripheral Visions)

Most Recent Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation