Group thinking | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Group thinking 

In his Jan. 25 article, "UNC report proposes rules for big gifts," Charles Duncan quotes Sherryl Kleinman on her vociferous dislike for the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy. She avers that we mock and disparage UNC's efforts to "respect ethnic, gender, and sexual diversity and to create a more inclusive scholarly community." It would be more accurate to say that we do not believe that the kinds of courses that have been added to the curriculum, such as "Latina/o Studies," are necessary in order to show "respect" to anyone. An intellectually solid curriculum is neither disrespectful nor exclusionary. Moreover, cluttering up the curriculum with lots of "identity" courses does a disservice to the students who spend their time on them; it's like choosing to eat a bowl of jello rather than a bowl of soup.

Kleinman also cannot resist the snide assertion that we'd like to see the study of civilization confined to "great white men." Utterly baseless.

Students ought to study civilization without including or excluding people merely because of race or other personal characteristics. I would like to see students reading the autobiography of Frederick Douglass, among other works. What I reject is the idea that the curriculum must be designed to ensure that students read so many authors from this group, so many authors from that group, and so on. Merit has nothing to do with the penchant of modern liberals for assigning people to groups.

George C. Leef

Director, John W. Pope Center
for Higher Education Policy

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

This judge sets a bad example of what law enforcement is all about. This judge is a disgrace, he is …

by one truth on Deo Vindice! Some Confederate-Friendly Readers Sound Off on Judge Fred Battaglia (Letters to the Editor)

The founding fathers made this country! The founding fathers were brilliant thinkers, revolutionaries who gave us the country that these …

by one truth on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

Most Recent Comments

This judge sets a bad example of what law enforcement is all about. This judge is a disgrace, he is …

by one truth on Deo Vindice! Some Confederate-Friendly Readers Sound Off on Judge Fred Battaglia (Letters to the Editor)

The founding fathers made this country! The founding fathers were brilliant thinkers, revolutionaries who gave us the country that these …

by one truth on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Re-dedicate the monuments to veterans and leave it at that.

by Durham451 on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Tear down all Jefferson memorials! Racist Slave owner!

by John Trololo on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

Confederate Monuments?
Frankly the Dumbing Down of History is what I find deplorable here.
This blanket-condemnation of every Confederate …

by Mike PALADIN on Did You Think We Were Done Talking About Confederate Monuments? (Letters to the Editor)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation