Errata | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Errata 

Barry Yeoman's article focusing on Ken Hamm and his group ("Creation Nation," Feb. 22) was a great way to shine a little more light on the existence and motivations of a group of people that I don't agree with, but certainly want to know more about. Still, it doesn't help when we make a common and minor error that serves to further mislead people into thinking that Darwin's work was focused on Humans as some sort of pinnacle of either creation or evolution.

Darwin's most famous work was properly titled On the Origin of Species, not (as cited in Yeoman's article) On the Origin of the Species. Adding that extra word makes it sound as if Darwin's focus was on "the" species, in this case referring to modern humans. Darwin's work had more to do with finches than people, and he was trying to show the mechanism of speciation over time, not necessarily that humans came from a specific progenitor.

It's just one word, but dropping that small word misleads people about the focus of Darwin's work. Understanding natural selection is not about proving or disproving the existence of God or the origin of the universe. It's not even necessarily about the origin of humankind, no matter what "the" press tells us.

Britt Steed

Raleigh

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

Wait, why is eating meat necessary? There are plenty of other protein sources ie: plant based protein is abundant. No …

by ammi on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Yes, everyone has to eat, but no, people don't have to eat meat. http://theconversation.com/who-lives-longe…

by Dave Connelly on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Sunday Service (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Smoked Out (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

Wait, why is eating meat necessary? There are plenty of other protein sources ie: plant based protein is abundant. No …

by ammi on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Yes, everyone has to eat, but no, people don't have to eat meat. http://theconversation.com/who-lives-longe…

by Dave Connelly on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

Ellen, I dont see your comments anywhere in my inbox. Please email them to me directly: jbillman at indyweek dot …

by Jeffrey Billman on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

I also wrote you Indyweek. Please print my comments. North Carolina is hell for hogs also …

by Ellen Canavan on A Stinking Mess (Letters to the Editor)

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation