Durham Wants to Help Homeowners Whose Tax Bills Have Gone Up Because of Revitalization. But Should They Have to Pay the City Back If They Move? | Triangulator | Indy Week
Pin It

Durham Wants to Help Homeowners Whose Tax Bills Have Gone Up Because of Revitalization. But Should They Have to Pay the City Back If They Move? 

Durham officials are working on a loan program to help residents whose property taxes have gone up because of city-initiated revitalization, but how that program would work sparked fierce debate last week.

The idea sprang from a November city council work session in which longtime residents of the Southside neighborhood complained of an increase in their property taxes—$314 on average in 2016. At a work session Thursday, Mayor Bill Bell pitched a deferred loan program in which residents would get a loan for the difference in their property tax obligation from the previous year. They would only repay the zero-interest loan when they sold or transferred their home. Homeowners would be able to apply annually, but for no more than four years.  Loans would be available to residents of Southside, Historic Northeast Central Durham, and Southwest Central Durham who have owned their homes for at least five years.

But some council members took issue with the idea of asking already struggling homeowners to pay back these loans when they sell their homes.

Jillian Johnson said it "makes no sense" to ask these homeowners to pay back their loans when the city gives economic incentives to private developers—for example, the $100,000 given recently to a group seeking to redevelop a building on Chapel Hill Street

"We will never recoup that money," Johnson said. "We did it because we believe there are benefits to the city to having that corridor redeveloped that will benefit the community in different ways. ... I think nickel-and-diming people who are really struggling to stay in their homes when we are willing to give out thousands of dollars, millions of dollars to companies does not make sense."

Bell said his comments had been "totally misconstrued." He argued that this project shouldn't be compared to economic incentive programs and said homeowners wouldn't lose any money but would rather be able to stay in their homes longer because of the city's assistance.

City staffers estimate that $116,844 to $141,144 would be needed to assist eligible homeowners in the targeted neighborhoods.

This article appeared in print with the headline "+NICKEL AND DIME."

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Triangulator



Twitter Activity

Comments

I really don't understand the purpose of this article except to cause dissent. Assumptions and interpretations were made that were …

by Terry Snyder on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Two points stand out immediately upon reading this account.

If you are going to insist on continuing to use …

by FONCitizen on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Most Recent Comments

I really don't understand the purpose of this article except to cause dissent. Assumptions and interpretations were made that were …

by Terry Snyder on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Two points stand out immediately upon reading this account.

If you are going to insist on continuing to use …

by FONCitizen on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Councilor Crowder wanted to wait on the vote but Mayor McFarlane pushed it through.

by Apache101 on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

Ha! The schools cry for smaller classes but its all a fraud. When they are told by the legislature to …

by MJKopechne on The Durham County Commission Asks the NCGA to Hold Off on Class-Size Reductions (Triangulator)

Once again I must take exception to being labelled as "slow-growth." I ran on a platform of responsible growth, smart …

by Stefanie Mendell on The Disruption on the New Raleigh City Council Is a Blast from the Past (Triangulator)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation