Duke Energy Wants You to Pay for Its Coal Ash Mess | Triangulator | Indy Week
Pin It

Duke Energy Wants You to Pay for Its Coal Ash Mess 

Get out your wallets: Duke Energy, a behemoth with a market capitalization of more than $62 billion, wants you—not its shareholders—to pay for its coal ash mess.

Coal ash dominated local headlines between 2014, when thirty-nine thousand tons of toxic coal ash contaminated seventy miles of the Dan River, and 2016, when a state toxicologist testified that McCrory administration officials "knowingly told people that their water was safe when we knew it wasn't." Along the way, the Department of Environmental Quality fined Duke $25 million, though after private negotiations that penalty was reduced to just $6.6 million.

But that's just a drop in the bucket. Duke has estimated that cleaning up its thirty-three coal ash sites will cost more than $4 billion. That's where you come in.

In June, Duke proposed a nearly 17 percent rate hike, or about $17.80 a month (and $213 a year) extra for residential customers—an annual total of more than $477 million in additional revenue. Since then, that request has been pared down to about 15 percent, says Duke spokesman Randy Wheeless.

"Recent work to modernize power plants and generate cleaner electricity, responsibly manage coal ash, and respond to major storms is at the heart of Duke Energy Progress's rate increase request," Wheeless writes in an email. "... The cost of these services, including compliance with state and federal regulations that govern our work, is a responsibility we all share as consumers of electricity, so that the public and the environment are protected now and in the future."

This isn't a done deal yet. Hearings on the proposed hikes were supposed to kick off this week, but they've been delayed as the company and government attorneys work on a partial settlement.

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Triangulator



Twitter Activity

Comments

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. ... They're sending people that have lots of problems, and …

by Tryan Banme on A History of Donald Trump’s Racism, Abridged (Triangulator)

"Computer-driven vehicles? Really? We've been saying that for the last 30 years."

?! The hardware for a fully autonomous …

by Mark Bahner on Environmentalists Aren’t Happy About the NCDOT’s Plan to Finish the I-540 Beltway (Triangulator)

Most Recent Comments

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. ... They're sending people that have lots of problems, and …

by Tryan Banme on A History of Donald Trump’s Racism, Abridged (Triangulator)

"Computer-driven vehicles? Really? We've been saying that for the last 30 years."

?! The hardware for a fully autonomous …

by Mark Bahner on Environmentalists Aren’t Happy About the NCDOT’s Plan to Finish the I-540 Beltway (Triangulator)

Computer-driven vehicles? Really? We've been saying that for the last 30 years.

And even if that managed to come …

by Mark Neill on Environmentalists Aren’t Happy About the NCDOT’s Plan to Finish the I-540 Beltway (Triangulator)

It's a very bad time to do any transportation project that is capital-intensive and long-term. The reason is that computer-driven …

by Mark Bahner on Environmentalists Aren’t Happy About the NCDOT’s Plan to Finish the I-540 Beltway (Triangulator)

Seriously? Time for opposers to get their heads out of the sand and see that Raleigh's growth is blowing up. …

by Granted on Environmentalists Aren’t Happy About the NCDOT’s Plan to Finish the I-540 Beltway (Triangulator)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation