Chatham County | Our Endorsements | Indy Week
Pin It

Chatham County 

Land transfer tax

There's been plenty of debate about the proposed 0.4 percent tax on the sale of real estate that the N.C. General Assembly this year authorized local governments to enact—with voter approval. Realtors and homebuilders decried it as a "home tax" and fought it tooth and nail on Jones Street—and succeeded in getting it reduced from 1 percent. Supporters who see it as a more progressive alternative to raising revenue through increasing property taxes cried foul at the reduction, particularly because it meant that municipalities were excluded from the revenue stream.

But in Chatham County, where voters will face the ballot question Nov. 6, one thing is clear: The fast-growing county needs as much revenue as it can muster for building schools—first and foremost—and other infrastructure to support the exploding population.

County leaders estimate that the tax would generate $2.5 million in 2008-09, the equivalent of a 3.4-cent increase in the property tax. Under an agreement county commissioners struck, 85 percent would be reserved specifically for school needs—projected at roughly $2 million annually over the next several years. In addition, if the land transfer tax passes, commissioners have agreed to reduce the county's school impact fee on new construction from $2,900 to $1,900.

We support a For vote on this referendum.

spacer.gif

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Our Endorsements



Twitter Activity

Comments

Status quo is not what we need in Washington now. We need bold New leadership Price has had is time …

by Phd58 on In U.S. House District 4, the INDY Endorses David Price (Our Endorsements)

Mark Kleinschmidt, really? He is an underhanded crook who is doing this solely for his own benefit while he reaps …

by 911Bowery@gmail.com on Progress Is This Way: Fine, Get Mad About Trump. But Local Elections Matter More. (Our Endorsements)

Most Read

Most Recent Comments

Status quo is not what we need in Washington now. We need bold New leadership Price has had is time …

by Phd58 on In U.S. House District 4, the INDY Endorses David Price (Our Endorsements)

Mark Kleinschmidt, really? He is an underhanded crook who is doing this solely for his own benefit while he reaps …

by 911Bowery@gmail.com on Progress Is This Way: Fine, Get Mad About Trump. But Local Elections Matter More. (Our Endorsements)

Why no mention of Richard L. Watkins? He's a live wire, very accomplished and attractive, and advocates everything we want, …

by thrasher on In U.S. House District 4, the INDY Endorses David Price (Our Endorsements)

FYI -- there are three candidates in NC-4. Not sure why the Indy completely omitted that fact and wrote the …

by OrionMaize on In U.S. House District 4, the INDY Endorses David Price (Our Endorsements)

CT I'm sure the dixiecrats have already selected his replacement and I'm doubtful if he makes it through another term. …

by Black Raleigh on In U.S. House District 4, the INDY Endorses David Price (Our Endorsements)

© 2018 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation