Casualties and profits | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Casualties and profits 

I would like to inform Stuart Greenberg that we will be living in a post-9/11 world from now on, no matter what we do, so using this to justify constitutional erosion is about as effective as saying "the sky is blue" ("Let Bush violate First Amendment all he wants," Back Talk, Feb. 20).

No one is hiding behind the First Amendment. They are standing up and saying, "Look, this is our agreement, in writing, that permits you to govern us. These are the rules. Stick by them or get out."

John Locke's "Treatise of Government," anyone?

Perhaps Greenberg needs be reminded of the 4,000 U.S. casualty milestone just passed, the unknown hundreds of thousands Iraqis dead and the tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers narrowly escaping death through the miracles of modern science.

Greenberg seems to think that BushCo does everything in order to "protect our country." May I remind him this is the administration so closely tied to the defense industry that they form a homogenous smirking blob? This is the administration of back-room deals, midnight passage of unread legislation, unbridled executive power and the full blossoming of the military-industrial complex. Please watch the film Why We Fight. Turncoat? Faction? We're all American, and nothing bleeds patriotism quite like questioning those who govern you.

As for impeaching BushCo, if the people of these United States understand the role constitutional integrity has regarding the survival of our nation, it is inevitable. People, our Constitution is all we have. Perhaps the chicken-ass Democrats will impeach him right before he leaves office, rendering the impeachment functionally useless, though getting the message across: You can't cross the Constitution. It is not a "piece of paper," however much Bush wants it to be.

Martilias Farrell
Chapel Hill

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

Most Recent Comments

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

Who are these people who behave so badly and dare anyone to comment on them in public? Are they relatively …

by MickeyNotMouse on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Julian Baddy's comment about or "fear" of an "idea" from the south is ridiculous.
Bigotry is not an "idea". Hate …

by George Greene on Monumental Debates (Letters to the Editor)

Why exactly does anyone think Edwin Yoder is credible when he says that listeners would be appalled by Julian Carr's …

by George Greene on Monumental Debates (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation