Cary unfair to New Hill | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Cary unfair to New Hill 

I read Cary Town Manager Bill Coleman's letter in response to the Evans Road story ("Indy unfair to Cary staff in Evans Road story," Back Talk, March 5). There is an entire community in southwest Wake County, New Hill, that is familiar with the "integrity, dignity, respect and fairness" practiced by the Cary town staff (and the council, for that matter). We in New Hill know firsthand how little value the town staff and officials place on their Statement of Values. One of Coleman's senior staff dismissively said about New Hill, "Seems to me New Hill is a ZIP code, not a community."

The Town of Cary recklessly condemned a parcel for a sewage plant without the involvement of the local community or the approval from state or federal authorities. The analysis justifying the site was woefully incomplete and failed to include a critical analysis of other locations.

During the initial state environmental impact study process, the Town of Cary misrepresented the demographics of the neighborhood (predominantly below median income for Wake County and predominantly minority) where it was planning to locate the facility. After being taken to task on this by the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Coleman apologized for the "misinterpretation," which of course favored Cary's position at the expense of the minority neighborhood.

Coleman went on to state, "We have concerns about quantitatively including environmental justice demographics in a site-ranking process without first discussing potential impacts—both favorable and adverse—and ways to mitigate adverse impacts." Favorable impacts? Perhaps he thinks that some folks might like the odor, noise, traffic and light pollution.

The Town of Cary's actions toward New Hill are consistent with its actions toward the Evans Road neighborhood.

John Brubaker
New Hill

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. The Crown of Civilization (Letters to the Editor)

Most Recent Comments

in regard to the abortion law under consideration - can we assume these wise white men will see to it …

by jej on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

When you pull tongue-in-cheek comments out of context of the original thread, it'd be nice if you had the courtesy …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

Thanks for pulling my quote out without noting that the comment was made tongue-in-cheek. A bit creepy when you pull …

by Heath Satow on Not a Lot of Nazi Statues in Berlin (Letters to the Editor)

was the misogony stuff actually some type of performance art?

by sthomper on Mob Rule (Letters to the Editor)

Ryan Plankenhorn appears to have good intentions with his remarks, and it is much appreciated. I would kindly like him …

by MelissaJ123 on Blind Attack (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 320 E. Chapel Hill St., Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation